| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005 |
| Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. | |
| Gasparatos A; Scolobig A | |
| 发表日期 | 2012 |
| 出处 | Ecological Economics 80: 1-7 |
| 出版年 | 2012 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Insights from different academic disciplines become relevant when developing solutions for a sustainable future. This gradual realization has influenced the emergence of dedicated inter- and transdisciplinary fields of enquiry such as sustainability science and sustainability economics. However, despite this concerted academic effort we are still far from agreeing on how to define, plan and measure the progress towards sustainability. |
| 主题 | Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV) ; Postdoctoral Scholars (PDS) ; Risk & ; Resilience (RISK) |
| 关键词 | Sustainability assessment Assessment tools Tool selection Value articulating institutions |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/9927/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/129525 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Gasparatos A,Scolobig A. Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool.. 2012. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Gasparatos A]的文章 |
| [Scolobig A]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Gasparatos A]的文章 |
| [Scolobig A]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Gasparatos A]的文章 |
| [Scolobig A]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
