G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.020
Comparing carbon capture and storage (CCS) with concentrating solar power (CSP): Potentials, costs, risks, and barriers.
Lilliestam J; Bielicki JM; Patt A
发表日期2012
出处Energy Policy 47: 447-456
出版年2012
语种英语
摘要Coal power coupled with Carbon [Dioxide] Capture and Storage (CCS), and Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) technologies are often included in the portfolio of climate change mitigation options intended to decarbonize electricity systems. Both of these technologies can provide baseload electricity, are in early stages of maturity, and have benefits, costs, and obstacles. We compare and contrast CCS applied to coal-fired power plants with CSP. At present, both technologies are more expensive than existing electricity-generating options, but costs should decrease with large-scale deployment, especially in the case of CSP. For CCS, technological challenges still remain, storage risks must be clarified, and regulatory and legal uncertainties remain. For CSP, current challenges include electricity transmission and business models for a rapid and extensive expansion of high-voltage transmission lines. The need for international cooperation may impede CSP expansion in Europe.
主题Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV) ; Risk & ; Resilience (RISK)
关键词Carbon dioxide capture and storage Concentrating solar power Electricity sector decarbonization
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/9948/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/129538
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lilliestam J,Bielicki JM,Patt A. Comparing carbon capture and storage (CCS) with concentrating solar power (CSP): Potentials, costs, risks, and barriers.. 2012.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Lilliestam J]的文章
[Bielicki JM]的文章
[Patt A]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Lilliestam J]的文章
[Bielicki JM]的文章
[Patt A]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Lilliestam J]的文章
[Bielicki JM]的文章
[Patt A]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。