Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.020 |
Comparing carbon capture and storage (CCS) with concentrating solar power (CSP): Potentials, costs, risks, and barriers. | |
Lilliestam J; Bielicki JM; Patt A | |
发表日期 | 2012 |
出处 | Energy Policy 47: 447-456 |
出版年 | 2012 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Coal power coupled with Carbon [Dioxide] Capture and Storage (CCS), and Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) technologies are often included in the portfolio of climate change mitigation options intended to decarbonize electricity systems. Both of these technologies can provide baseload electricity, are in early stages of maturity, and have benefits, costs, and obstacles. We compare and contrast CCS applied to coal-fired power plants with CSP. At present, both technologies are more expensive than existing electricity-generating options, but costs should decrease with large-scale deployment, especially in the case of CSP. For CCS, technological challenges still remain, storage risks must be clarified, and regulatory and legal uncertainties remain. For CSP, current challenges include electricity transmission and business models for a rapid and extensive expansion of high-voltage transmission lines. The need for international cooperation may impede CSP expansion in Europe. |
主题 | Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV) ; Risk & ; Resilience (RISK) |
关键词 | Carbon dioxide capture and storage Concentrating solar power Electricity sector decarbonization |
URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/9948/ |
来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/129538 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lilliestam J,Bielicki JM,Patt A. Comparing carbon capture and storage (CCS) with concentrating solar power (CSP): Potentials, costs, risks, and barriers.. 2012. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。