G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.5751/ES-05390-180202
Vulnerability to weather disasters: The choice of coping strategies in rural Uganda.
Helgeson JF; Dietz S; Hochrainer-Stigler S
发表日期2013
出处Ecology and Society 18 (2)
出版年2013
语种英语
摘要When a natural disaster hits, the affected households try to cope with its impacts. A variety of coping strategies, from reducing current consumption to disposing of productive assets, may be employed. The latter strategies are especially worrisome because they may reduce the capacity of the household to generate income in the future, possibly leading to chronic poverty. We used the results of a household survey in rural Uganda to ask, first, what coping strategies would tend to be employed in the event of a weather disaster, second, given that multiple strategies can be chosen, in what combinations would they tend to be employed, and, third, given that asset-liquidation strategies can be particularly harmful for the future income prospects of households, what determines their uptake? Our survey is one of the largest of its kind, containing over 3000 observations garnered by local workers using smartphone technology. We found that in this rural sample, by far, the most frequently reported choice would be to sell livestock. This is rather striking because asset-based theories would predict more reliance on strategies like eating and spending less today, which avoid disposal of productive assets. It may well be that livestock is held as a form of liquid savings to, among other things, help bounce back from a weather disaster. Although, we did find that other strategies that might undermine future prospects were avoided, notably selling land or the home and disrupting the children's education. Our econometric analysis revealed a fairly rich set of determinants of different subsets of coping strategies. Perhaps most notably, households with a more educated head are much less likely to choose coping strategies involving taking their own children out of education.
主题Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV) ; Risk & ; Resilience (RISK)
关键词Coping strategies Covariate risk Education Extreme weather Poverty trap Small-scale farming Uganda Vulnerability
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/10443/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/129605
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Helgeson JF,Dietz S,Hochrainer-Stigler S. Vulnerability to weather disasters: The choice of coping strategies in rural Uganda.. 2013.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
ES-2012-5390.pdf(918KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Helgeson JF]的文章
[Dietz S]的文章
[Hochrainer-Stigler S]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Helgeson JF]的文章
[Dietz S]的文章
[Hochrainer-Stigler S]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Helgeson JF]的文章
[Dietz S]的文章
[Hochrainer-Stigler S]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: ES-2012-5390.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。