Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1111/gcb.12160 |
How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? | |
Smith P; Haberl H; Popp A; Erb K-H; Lauk C; Harper R; Tubiello FN; Bottcher H | |
发表日期 | 2013 |
出处 | Global Change Biology 19 (8): 2285-2302 |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Feeding 9.10 billion people by 2050 and preventing dangerous climate change are two of the greatest challenges facing humanity. Both challenges must be met while reducing the impact of land management on ecosystem services that deliver vital goods and services, and support human health and well-being. Few studies to date have considered the interactions between these challenges. In this study we briefly outline the challenges, review the supply- and demand-side climate mitigation potential available in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use AFOLU sector and options for delivering food security. We briefly outline some of the synergies and trade-offs afforded by mitigation practices, before presenting an assessment of the mitigation potential possible in the AFOLU sector under possible future scenarios in which demand-side measures codeliver to aid food security. We conclude that while supply-side mitigation measures, such as changes in land management, might either enhance or negatively impact food security, demand-side mitigation measures, such as reduced waste or demand for livestock products, should benefit both food security and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. Demand-side measures offer a greater potential (1.5-15.6 Gt CO2-eq/yr) in meeting both challenges than do supply-side measures (1.5-4.3 Gt CO2-eq/yr at carbon prices between 20 and 100 US$ tCO2-eq/yr), but given the enormity of challenges, all options need to be considered. Supply-side measures should be implemented immediately, focussing on those that allow the production of more agricultural product per unit of input. For demand-side measures, given the difficulties in their implementation and lag in their effectiveness, policy should be introduced quickly, and should aim to codeliver to other policy agenda, such as improving environmental quality or improving dietary health. These problems facing humanity in the 21st Century are extremely challenging, and policy that addresses multiple objectives is required now more than ever. |
主题 | Ecosystems Services and Management (ESM) |
关键词 | AFOLU Agriculture Climate Ecosystem services Food security Forestry GHG Mitigation |
URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/10391/ |
来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/129724 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Smith P,Haberl H,Popp A,et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Smith P]的文章 |
[Haberl H]的文章 |
[Popp A]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Smith P]的文章 |
[Haberl H]的文章 |
[Popp A]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Smith P]的文章 |
[Haberl H]的文章 |
[Popp A]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。