G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125004
Implications of climate mitigation for future agricultural production.
Mueller C; Elliot J; Chryssanthacopoulos J; Deryng D; Folberth C; Pugh TAM; Schmid E
发表日期2015
出处Environmental Research Letters 10 (12): no.125004
出版年2015
语种英语
摘要Climate change is projected to negatively impact biophysical agricultural productivity in much of the world. Actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate future climate changes, are thus of central importance for agricultural production. Climate impacts are, however, not unidirectional; some crops in some regions (primarily higher latitudes) are projected to benefit, particularly if increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is assumed to strongly increase crop productivity at large spatial and temporal scales. Climate mitigation measures that are implemented by reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations lead to reduction both in the strength of climate change and in the benefits of carbon dioxide fertilization. Consequently, analysis of the effects of climate mitigation on agricultural productivity must address not only regions for which mitigation is likely to reduce or even reverse climate damage. There are also regions that are likely to see increased crop yields due to climate change, which may lose these added potentials under mitigation action. Comparing data from the most comprehensive archive of crop yield projections publicly available, we find that climate mitigation leads to overall benefits from avoided damages at the global scale and especially in many regions that are already at risk of food insecurity today. Ignoring controversial carbon dioxide fertilization effects on crop productivity, we find that for the median projection aggressive mitigation could eliminate ~81% of the negative impacts of climate change on biophysical agricultural productivity globally by the end of the century. In this case, the benefits of mitigation typically extend well into temperate regions, but vary by crop and underlying climate mode projections. Should large benefits to crop yields from carbon dioxide fertilization be realized, the effects of mitigation become much more mixed, though still positive globally and beneficial in many food insecure countries.
主题Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV) ; Risk & ; Resilience (RISK)
关键词AgMIP agriculture carbon dioxide climate change climate mitigation crop model ISI-MIP
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/11739/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/130206
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Mueller C,Elliot J,Chryssanthacopoulos J,et al. Implications of climate mitigation for future agricultural production.. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Implications%20of%20(2469KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Mueller C]的文章
[Elliot J]的文章
[Chryssanthacopoulos J]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Mueller C]的文章
[Elliot J]的文章
[Chryssanthacopoulos J]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Mueller C]的文章
[Elliot J]的文章
[Chryssanthacopoulos J]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Implications%20of%20climate%20mitigation.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。