G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
The effectiveness of imperfect weighting in advice taking.
Bednarik P; Schultze T
发表日期2015
出处Judgment and Decision Making 10 (3): 265-276.
出版年2015
语种英语
摘要We investigate decision-making in the Judge-Advisor-System where one person, the "judge", wants to estimate the number of a certain entity and is given advice by another person. The question is how to combine the judge's initial estimate and that of the advisor in order to get the optimal expected outcome. A previous approach compared two frequently applied strategies, taking the average or choosing the better estimate. In most situations, averaging produced the better estimates. However, this approach neglected a third strategy that judges frequently use, namely a weighted mean of the judges' initial estimate and the advice. We compare the performance of averaging and choosing to weighting in a theoretical analysis. If the judge can, without error, detect ability differences between judge and advisor, a straight-forward calculation shows that weighting outperforms both of these strategies. More interestingly, after introducing errors in the perception of the ability differences, we show that such emph{imperfect} weighting may or may not be the optimal strategy. The relative performance of imperfect weighting compared to averaging or choosing depends on the size of the actual ability differences as well as the magnitude of the error. However, for a sizeable range of ability differences and errors, weighting is preferable to averaging and more so to choosing. Our analysis expands previous research by showing that weighting, even when imperfect, is an appropriate advice taking strategy and under which circumsances judges benefit most from applying it.
主题Evolution and Ecology (EEP) ; Risk & ; Resilience (RISK) ; Postdoctoral Scholars (PDS) ; Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV)
关键词advice taking judge-advisor-system rational behavior normative model
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/11440/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/130244
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bednarik P,Schultze T. The effectiveness of imperfect weighting in advice taking.. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
The%20effectiveness%(817KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bednarik P]的文章
[Schultze T]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bednarik P]的文章
[Schultze T]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bednarik P]的文章
[Schultze T]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: The%20effectiveness%20of%20imperfect%20weighting%20in%20advice%20taking.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。