Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1016/.techfore.2015.07.011 |
A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or beaking climate targets - The AMPERE study staged accession scenarios for climate policy". | |
Kriegler E; Riahi K; Schwanitz VJ; Rao S; Johnson N; Krey V; McCollum D | |
发表日期 | 2015 |
出处 | Technological Forecasting and Social Change 99: 273-276 |
出版年 | 2015 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | We provide a rejoinder to a review (Rosen, 2015) of our original article "Making or breaking climate targets - the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy" (Kriegler et al., 2015a). We have a substantial disagreement with the content of the review, and feel that it is plagued by a number of misconceptions about the nature of the AMPERE study and the integrated assessment modeling approach employed by it. We therefore see this rejoinder as an opportunity to clarify these misconceptions and advance the debate by providing aclearer understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and ultimately the value of integrated assessment. |
主题 | Energy (ENE) ; Ecosystems Services and Management (ESM) |
关键词 | integrated assessment modeling model comparison mitigation costs peer review |
URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/11350/ |
来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/130292 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kriegler E,Riahi K,Schwanitz VJ,et al. A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or beaking climate targets - The AMPERE study staged accession scenarios for climate policy".. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。