Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.052 |
A reply to “Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors”. | |
Koomey J; Hultman N E; Grubler A | |
发表日期 | 2017 |
出处 | Energy Policy 102: 640-643 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Lovering et al. (2016) present data on the overnight costs of more than half of nuclear reactors built worldwide since the beginning of the nuclear age. The authors claim that this consolidated data set offers more accurate insights than previous country-level assessments. Unfortunately, the authors make analytical choices that mask nuclear power's real construction costs, cherry pick data, and include misleading data on early experimental and demonstration reactors. For those reasons, serious students of such issues should look elsewhere for guidance about understanding the true costs of nuclear power. |
主题 | Transitions to New Technologies (TNT) |
关键词 | Nuclear power Technology costs Learning rates |
URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/12747/ |
来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/130841 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Koomey J,Hultman N E,Grubler A. A reply to “Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors”.. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
A%20reply%20to%20his(654KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。