G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aa57a8
Intercomparison of global river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation --- Part II: Multiple models analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri-Mississippi and Green-Colorado.
Masaki Y; Hanasaki N; Biemans H; Müller Schmied H; Tang Q; Wada Y; Gosling S; Takahashi K
发表日期2017
出处Environmental Research Letters 12 (5): 055002
出版年2017
语种英语
摘要We performed a twofold intercomparison of river discharge regulated by dams under multiple meteorological forcings among multiple global hydrological models for a historical period by simulation. Paper II provides an intercomparison of river discharge simulated by five hydrological models under four meteorological forcings. This is the first global multimodel intercomparison study on dam-regulated river flow. Although the simulations were conducted globally, the Missouri-Mississippi and Green-Colorado Rivers were chosen as case-study sites in this study. The hydrological models incorporate generic schemes of dam operation, not specific to a certain dam. We examined river discharge on a longitudinal section of river channels to investigate the effects of dams on simulated discharge, especially at the seasonal time scale. We found that the magnitude of dam regulation differed considerably among the hydrological models. The difference was attributable not only to dam operation schemes but also to the magnitude of simulated river discharge flowing into dams. That is, although a similar algorithm of dam operation schemes was incorporated in different hydrological models, the magnitude of dam regulation substantially differed among the models. Intermodel discrepancies tended to decrease toward the lower reaches of these river basins, which means model dependence is less significant toward lower reaches. These case-study results imply that, intermodel comparisons of river discharge should be made at different locations along the river’s course to critically examine the performance of hydrological models because the performance can vary with the locations.
主题Water (WAT)
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14296/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/130957
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Masaki Y,Hanasaki N,Biemans H,et al. Intercomparison of global river discharge simulations focusing on dam operation --- Part II: Multiple models analysis in two case-study river basins, Missouri-Mississippi and Green-Colorado.. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Masaki%2Bet%2Bal_201(848KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Masaki Y]的文章
[Hanasaki N]的文章
[Biemans H]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Masaki Y]的文章
[Hanasaki N]的文章
[Biemans H]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Masaki Y]的文章
[Hanasaki N]的文章
[Biemans H]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Masaki%2Bet%2Bal_2017_Environ._Res._Lett._10.1088_1748-9326_aa57a8%281%29.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。