G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1073/pnas.1618308114
Impact of population growth and population ethics on climate change mitigation policy.
Scovronick N; Budolfson MB; Dennig F; Fleurbaey M; Siebert A; Socolow RH; Spears D; Wagner F
发表日期2017
出处Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (46): 12338-12343
出版年2017
语种英语
摘要Future population growth is uncertain and matters for climate policy: higher growth entails more emissions and means more people will be vulnerable to climate-related impacts. We show that how future population is valued importantly determines mitigation decisions. Using the Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy model, we explore two approaches to valuing population: a discounted version of total utilitarianism (TU), which considers total wellbeing and is standard in social cost of carbon dioxide (SCC) models, and of average utilitarianism (AU), which ignores population size and sums only each time period’s discounted average wellbeing. Under both approaches, as population increases the SCC increases, but optimal peak temperature decreases. The effect is larger under TU, because it responds to the fact that a larger population means climate change hurts more people: for example, in 2025, assuming the United Nations (UN)-high rather than UN-low population scenario entails an increase in the SCC of 85% under TU vs. 5% under AU. The difference in the SCC between the two population scenarios under TU is comparable to commonly debated decisions regarding time discounting. Additionally, we estimate the avoided mitigation costs implied by plausible reductions in population growth, finding that large near-term savings ($billions annually) occur under TU; savings under AU emerge in the more distant future. These savings are larger than spending shortfalls for human development policies that may lower fertility. Finally, we show that whether lowering population growth entails overall improvements in wellbeing—rather than merely cost savings—again depends on the ethical approach to valuing population.
主题Air Quality & ; Greenhouse Gases (AIR) ; Mitigation of Air Pollution (MAG)
关键词population, climate change, social cost of carbon, social welfare, emissions
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14915/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/130994
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Scovronick N,Budolfson MB,Dennig F,et al. Impact of population growth and population ethics on climate change mitigation policy.. 2017.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Scovronick N]的文章
[Budolfson MB]的文章
[Dennig F]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Scovronick N]的文章
[Budolfson MB]的文章
[Dennig F]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Scovronick N]的文章
[Budolfson MB]的文章
[Dennig F]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。