G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1007/s10726-016-9494-6
A robustness study of state-of-the-art surrogate weights for MCDM.
Danielson M; Ekenberg L
发表日期2017
出处Group Decision and Negotiation 26 (4): 677-691
出版年2017
语种英语
摘要A vast number of methods for solving multi-criteria decision problems have been suggested for assessing criteria weights requiring more exact input data than users normally are able to provide. In particular, the selection of adequate criteria weights is difficult and in order to be realistic, other methods must be introduced. One class of such methods is to introduce so called surrogate weights, where numerical weights are assigned to each criterion based on a cardinal or ordinal rank ordering, assumed to represent the information extracted from the user. One essential problem is the robustness of such methods. In this article, we compare state-of-the-art methods based on surrogate weights from the literature and, utilizing a simulation approach, discuss underlying assumptions and robustness properties. This results in a quantitative measurement of these weighting methods and a methodology applicable also to forthcoming methods.
主题Risk & ; Resilience (RISK) ; Risk, Policy and Vulnerability (RPV)
关键词Multi-criteria decision analysis surrogate criteria weights robustness criteria ranking rank order
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/13385/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/131016
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Danielson M,Ekenberg L. A robustness study of state-of-the-art surrogate weights for MCDM.. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Robustness.pdf(423KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Danielson M]的文章
[Ekenberg L]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Danielson M]的文章
[Ekenberg L]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Danielson M]的文章
[Ekenberg L]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Robustness.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。