G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aa9938
Sources of uncertainty in hydrological climate impact assessment: a cross-scale study.
Hattermann F; Vetter T; Breuer L; Su B; Daggupati P; Donnelly C; Fekete B; Flörke M
发表日期2018
出处Environmental Research Letters 13 (1): e015006
出版年2018
语种英语
摘要Climate change impacts on water availability and hydrological extremes are major concerns as regards the Sustainable Development Goals. Impacts on hydrology are normally investigated as part of a modelling chain, in which climate projections from multiple climate models are used as inputs to multiple impact models, under different greenhouse gas emissions scenarios, which are resulting in different amounts of global temperature rise. While the goal is generally to investigate the relevance of changes in climate for the water cycle, water resources or hydrological extremes, it is often the case that variations in other components of the model chain obscure the effect of climate scenario variation. This is particularly important when assessing the impacts of relatively lower magnitudes of global warming, such as those associated with the aspirational goals of the Paris Agreement. In our study, we use ANOVA (ANalyses Of VAriance) to allocate and quantify the main sources of uncertainty in the hydrological impact modelling chain. In turn we determine the statistical significance of different sources of uncertainty. We achieve this by using a set of 5 climate models and up to 13 hydrological models, for 9 large scale river basins across the globe, under 4 emissions scenarios. The impact variable we consider in our analysis is daily river discharge. We analyze overall water availability and flow regime, including seasonality, high flows and low flows. Scaling effects are investigated by separately looking at discharge generated by global and regional hydrological models respectively. Finally, we compare our results with other recently published studies. We find that small differences in global temperature rise associated with some emissions scenarios have mostly significant impacts on river discharge – however, climate model related uncertainty is so large that it obscures the sensitivity of the hydrological system.
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14999/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/131285
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hattermann F,Vetter T,Breuer L,et al. Sources of uncertainty in hydrological climate impact assessment: a cross-scale study.. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Hattermann%2Bet%2Bal(2408KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hattermann F]的文章
[Vetter T]的文章
[Breuer L]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hattermann F]的文章
[Vetter T]的文章
[Breuer L]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hattermann F]的文章
[Vetter T]的文章
[Breuer L]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Hattermann%2Bet%2Bal_2017_Environ._Res._Lett._10.1088_1748-9326_aa9938.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。