G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1007/s11027-018-9817-9
The sensitivity of the costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) to future socioeconomic drivers and its implications for mitigation policy design.
Gusti M; Forsell N; Havlik P; Khabarov N; Kraxner F; Obersteiner M
发表日期2018
出处Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
出版年2018
语种英语
摘要Climate change mitigation policies for the land use, land use change, and forestry (LULUCF) sector are commonly assessed based on marginal abatement cost curves (MACC) derived from optimization models or engineering approaches. Yet, little is known about the space of validity of MACCs and how they are influenced by changes in main underlying drivers. In this study, we apply the Global Forest Model (G4M) to explore the sensitivity of MACCs to variation of socioeconomic drivers of deforestation, afforestation, and forest management activities. Particularly, three key factors are considered: (I) wood price, as an indicator of timber market developments; (II) agricultural land price, as a proxy representing the developments on agricultural markets; and (III) corruption coefficient, representing the progress in institutional development and measuring abatement costs use efficiency. The results indicate that the MACCs are more sensitive to the corruption coefficient than to agricultural land price and wood price. Furthermore, we find that the MACCs are more robust with high carbon dioxide (CO2) price and that the sensitivity of the MACCs is higher at low CO2 prices. In general, it can be concluded that when assessing medium-term mitigation policies characterized by low CO2 prices, MACCs need to be developed in-line with institutions currently in place. When designing long-term mitigation policy characterized by high CO2 prices, the role of the analyzed drivers in MACCs estimation is less important.
主题Ecosystems Services and Management (ESM)
关键词Marginal abatement cost curve Sensitivity Institutional quality Economic parameters Mitigation policy MACC uncertainty
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/15323/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/131373
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Gusti M,Forsell N,Havlik P,et al. The sensitivity of the costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) to future socioeconomic drivers and its implications for mitigation policy design.. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
s11027-018-9817-9.pd(2044KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Gusti M]的文章
[Forsell N]的文章
[Havlik P]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Gusti M]的文章
[Forsell N]的文章
[Havlik P]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Gusti M]的文章
[Forsell N]的文章
[Havlik P]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: s11027-018-9817-9.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。