Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aab96f |
Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improves estimates of monthly discharges and hydrological extremes: a multi-model validation study. | |
Veldkamp T; Zhao F; Ward PJ; Moel H de; Aerts JCJH; Müller Schmied H; Portmann FT; Masaki Y | |
发表日期 | 2018 |
出处 | Environmental Research Letters : 1-28 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Human activities have a profound influence on river discharge, hydrological extremes, and water-related hazards. In this study, we compare the results of five state-of-the-art global hydrological models (GHMs) with observations to examine the role of human impact parameterizations (HIP) in the simulation of the mean, high, and low flows. The analysis is performed for 471 gauging stations across the globe and for the period 1971-2010. We find that the inclusion of HIP improves the performance of GHMs, both in managed and near-natural catchments. For near-natural catchments, the improvement in performance results from improvements in incoming discharges from upstream managed catchments. This finding is robust across GHMs, although the level of improvement and reasons for improvement vary greatly by GHM. The inclusion of HIP leads to a significant decrease in the bias of long-term mean monthly discharge in 36-73% of the studied catchments, and an improvement in modelled hydrological variability in 31-74% of the studied catchments. Including HIP in the GHMs also leads to an improvement in the simulation of hydrological extremes, compared to when HIP is excluded. Whilst the inclusion of HIP leads to decreases in simulated high-flows, it can lead to either increases or decreases in low-flows. This is due to the relative importance of the timing of return flows and reservoir operations and their associated uncertainties. Even with the inclusion of HIP, we find that model performance still not optimal. This highlights the need for further research linking the human management and hydrological domains, especially in those areas with a dominant human impact. The large variation in performance between GHMs, regions, and performance indicators, calls for a careful selection of GHMs, model components, and evaluation metrics in future model applications. |
主题 | Water (WAT) |
URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/15220/ |
来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/131404 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Veldkamp T,Zhao F,Ward PJ,et al. Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improves estimates of monthly discharges and hydrological extremes: a multi-model validation study.. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Veldkamp%2Bet%2Bal_2(2021KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Veldkamp T]的文章 |
[Zhao F]的文章 |
[Ward PJ]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Veldkamp T]的文章 |
[Zhao F]的文章 |
[Ward PJ]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Veldkamp T]的文章 |
[Zhao F]的文章 |
[Ward PJ]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。