| 来源类型 | Book Section |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-82128-8_2 |
| The framework. | |
| Kunreuther HC; Linnerooth-Bayer J; Lathrop J; Atz H; Macgill S; Mandl C; Schwarz M; Thompson M | |
| 发表日期 | 1983 |
| 出处 | Risk Analysis and Decision Processes. pp. 18-31 Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-82128-8 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-82128-8_2 . |
| 出版年 | 1983 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Comparing four case studies presents an analytic challenge since each country has its own style, decision process, and institutional arrangements. This chapter presents a set of unifying concepts that are sufficiently broad to enable us to structure the siting procedure in each country using a common framework. Building on these concepts we develop a set of reader’s aids that clarify the sequence of key events, the main concerns of the interested parties, and the arguments each stakeholder brings into the policy arena. Most importantly, these aids indicate how each siting problem was initially formulated and how it evolved over time. |
| 主题 | Energy Program (ENP) |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/12045/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/132949 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kunreuther HC,Linnerooth-Bayer J,Lathrop J,et al. The framework.. 1983. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
