| 来源类型 | Book Section |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_11 |
| Approaches to measurement of urban resilience. | |
| Ilmola-Sheppard L; Yamagata, Y.; Maruyama, H. | |
| 发表日期 | 2016 |
| 出处 | Urban Resilience. A Transformative Approach. Eds. Yamagata, Y. & Maruyama, H. , pp. 207-237 Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-39812-9 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_11 . |
| 出版年 | 2016 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Measurement is a prerequisite for systematic development. Resilience measurement approaches have been developed for assessment, planning and follow up resilience development. In this chapter I will review several different resilience assessment systems that either measure resilience performance (past incident and the urban system’s reaction in that) or resilience as competence (city’s perceived capability to adapt, recover and benefit of shocks). The methods analyzed are Rockefeller Foundations 100 resilient cities measurement framework, UN Habitat disaster measurement system, New Zeland based method, the system produced by the Strategy Alliance and the method developed in the Global X Network. None of these approaches are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ but they have been developed for a specific purpose, they have different objectives, principles, methods and data used. The analysis framework consisted of five systems theoretical dimensions: structure, interaction, coordination, renewal and resources. The analysis revealed that the approaches can be divided into three clusters; firstly survey based method that collect perceptions, second existing statistical data based methods and third multimethod approaches. One of the main conclusions was that none of these methods paid any or thorough attention on interaction between urban system components. Even if the methods try to assess resilience, the main source of adaptation—interaction dynamics—is not covered. But even if the existing resilience measurement methods have weaknesses, I think that the comparison presented in this chapter provides resilience developers a conceptual framework for assessment criteria for deciding which method they should use. |
| 主题 | Advanced Systems Analysis (ASA) |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/13853/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/134512 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ilmola-Sheppard L,Yamagata, Y.,Maruyama, H.. Approaches to measurement of urban resilience.. 2016. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
