| 来源类型 | Other |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| Regulation versus subsidies in conservation. | |
| Palokangas T | |
| 发表日期 | 2015 |
| 出处 | HECER Discussion Paper No.388, University of Helsinki , Helsinki, Finland. |
| 出版年 | 2015 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | This article connsiders the case where a number of countries produce goods from labor, government input and natural resources. Because conservation of natural resources anywhere yields utility in all countries and there is no benevolent international government, the coordination of conservation must be delegated to a regulator that may have its own interests. This article examines what is the efficient package of tools for that regulator. It is shown that if the minimum standarsds for conservation are used, then conservation subsidies are welfare decreasing, involvig excessive conservation. This suggests that e.g. in the EU project called NATURA 2000, it is not approprieate to provide "co-financing" for sites. |
| 主题 | Advanced Systems Analysis (ASA) |
| 关键词 | ecological habitats regulation conservation subsidies lobbying biodiversity |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/11846/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/135684 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Palokangas T. Regulation versus subsidies in conservation.. 2015. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Palokangas T]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Palokangas T]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Palokangas T]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
