Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research Report/Study |
规范类型 | 报告 |
How additional is the Clean Development Mechanism? | |
其他题名 | Analysis of the application of current tools and proposed alternatives |
Cames, M.; Harthan, R.; Füssler, J.; Lazarus, M.; Lee, C.; Erickson, P.; Spalding-Fecher, R. | |
发表日期 | 2016-03 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | While this study provides important insights to improve the CDM up to 2020, the approach taken in this study could also be applied more generally both to assess the environmental integrity of other compliance offset mechanisms, as well... |
摘要 | How additional is the Clean Development Mechanism? Analysis of the application of current tools and proposed alternatives While this study provides important insights to improve the CDM up to 2020, the approach taken in this study could also be applied more generally both to assess the environmental integrity of other compliance offset mechanisms, as well as to avoid flaws in the design of new mechanisms being used or established for compliance. Many of the shortcomings identified in this study are inherent to crediting mechanisms in general, not least the considerable uncertainty involved in the assessment of additionality and the information asymmetry between project developers and regulators. |
URL | https://www.oeko.de/en/publications/p-details/how-additional-is-the-clean-development-mechanism/ |
来源智库 | Institute for Applied Ecology (Germany) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/136360 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Cames, M.,Harthan, R.,Füssler, J.,et al. How additional is the Clean Development Mechanism?. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
clean_dev_mechanism_(3033KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。