G2TT
来源类型Peer Reviewed
规范类型其他
Evaluating Rural Electrification: Illustrating Research Gaps with the Case of Bhutan
Litzow, Erin; Thinley, Tshering; Other authors; Pattanayak, Subhrendu
发表日期2017-12-12
出版年2017
语种英语
摘要

Litzow, Erin, Subhrendu Pattanayak and Tshering Thinley. 2017. “Evaluating Rural Electrification: Illustrating Research Gaps with the Case of Bhutan.” EfD Discussion Paper Series 17-19.
Download reference

Electrification, especially rural electrification (RE), is a core component of the Sustainable Development Goals and a major focal point of the global development community. Despite this focus, more than one billion people worldwide do not have access to electricity, and electrification growth rates are not keeping pace with population growth. In this paper, we posit that lack of progress is partly driven by a misalignment between academic research and energy planners’ and policy makers’ needs. A majority of the studies measuring the impacts of electrification focus on precise estimation of a few outcomes, specifically health, education and productivity impacts. Other important impacts, e.g. environmental, have remained largely unstudied. As a consequence, quantifying the full set of costs and benefits of expanding electricity access is difficult and rarely done. When cost benefit analyses are done, they are often incomplete, and conclusions are highly susceptible to unavailable or uncertain parameter estimates. We illustrate these arguments in the case of Bhutan, where RE rates have expanded rapidly in the past few decades. We show that RE had positive impacts related to fuelwood consumption, education, and employment, but we do not find an effect on health. We then use these impact estimates to conduct cost-benefit analyses. Because there are more parameters in these calculations than we have data for from Bhutan, we transfer reasonable estimates from related contexts. However, to acknowledge the uncertainty induced by this process, we conduct Monte Carlo analyses to see if the NPV calculations are robust to alternative parameter values. Based on this exercise, we highlight research gaps that are preventing 1) thorough accounting of the net present value of RE in diverse settings and 2) financial investment in the sector.

主题Energy
URLhttps://efdinitiative.org/publications/evaluating-rural-electrification-illustrating-research-gaps-case-bhutan
来源智库Environment for Development Initiative (Sweden)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/138454
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Litzow, Erin,Thinley, Tshering,Other authors,et al. Evaluating Rural Electrification: Illustrating Research Gaps with the Case of Bhutan. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
efd_dp_17-19.pdf(1981KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Litzow, Erin]的文章
[Thinley, Tshering]的文章
[Other authors]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Litzow, Erin]的文章
[Thinley, Tshering]的文章
[Other authors]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Litzow, Erin]的文章
[Thinley, Tshering]的文章
[Other authors]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: efd_dp_17-19.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。