Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
A Comparison of Combustion Technologies for Electricity Generation | |
其他题名 | 2006 Update |
Rich Wong; Ed Whittingham | |
发表日期 | 2006-12-06 |
出版年 | 2006 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | This report updates the Pembina Institute's 2001 publication A Comparison of Combustion Technologies for Electricity Generation, republished in 2004 as Appendix 4 in Power for the Future: Towards A Sustainable Electricity System in Ontario. The review concludes that none of the coal-fired options are as environmentally favourable as the natural gas-fired options. Among the coal-fired options, IGCC showed the best opportunity for environmental performance, although it still has high CO2 emissions relative to natural gas-fired options. The review also notes that IGCC technologies may theoretically be combined with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. However, the review concludes that carbon storage options for Ontario are unproven and speculative, and that, given the extent of the research required to demonstrate their viability, they cannot be considered a serious possibility within the current 20-year electricity policy planning horizon. |
标签 | Ontario ; Climate Policy ; Carbon Pricing ; Electricity |
URL | https://www.pembina.org/node/1330 |
来源智库 | Pembina Institute (Canada) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/142949 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Rich Wong,Ed Whittingham. A Comparison of Combustion Technologies for Electricity Generation. 2006. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
8fbd39d0ecf5cc711686(17KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
Combustion_CCS_Final(1101KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Rich Wong]的文章 |
[Ed Whittingham]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Rich Wong]的文章 |
[Ed Whittingham]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Rich Wong]的文章 |
[Ed Whittingham]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。