G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
Reforming Kerosene Subsidies in India
其他题名Towards Better Alternatives
Abhishek Jain; Aditya Ramji
发表日期2016-04-01
出版年2016
语种英语
摘要

Overview

This study explores how to rationalise the kerosene subsidy to improve government effectiveness, as well as provide the maximum benefit to the households spending on the fuel. Kerosene has been continued as a subsidised fuel to provide affordable cooking and lighting to households in India for the last 60 years. However, the kerosene subsidy in its current form is highly inefficient. There is a need to shift to efficient alternatives as high levels of leakage in the distribution of subsidised kerosene mar the subsidy program in its current form.

The analysis, the second of a two-part series conducted with the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), found that only 49 per cent of the kerosene under the public distribution system (PDS) actually reaches households at a subsidised price. About 34 per cent of the allocated kerosene never reaches the intended households. According to the Economic Survey of India 2014-15, leakage in kerosene subsidies costs the exchequer USD 1.5 billion.

Petroleum products subsidies in India (including under-recoveries by Oil Marketing Companies)

Source: CEEW analysis, 2016

###

Key Findings

  • Only 49 per cent of the PDS kerosene actually reaches the households at a subsidised price. About 34 per cent of the allocated subsidised kerosene never reaches intended households.
  • There are many bureaucratic hurdles to getting a legal connection, especially in unauthorised slum areas.
  • Rural households spend INR 50–120 per month to meet their lighting needs from kerosene, with a median expenditure of INR 80.
  • Urban households spend between INR 400–800 per month, with expenditure crossing INR 1,500 per month in some cases.
  • The high upfront cost of an LPG connection limits many households’ ability to get one.
  • It also poses a significant public health burden on the overall economy, as using kerosene for cooking and lighting is hazardous to human health.
  • A transition from subsidised kerosene to alternatives could accrue net savings worth INR 8,000– 12,000 crore per annum for the lifetime of the alternative.

Monthly kerosene expenditure of rural households across states

Source: CEEW analysis, 2016

###

Key Recommendations

  • Make special provisions to release LPG connections in urban-slums through dedicated LPG distributors for such areas with 2–5 kg cylinder connections only.
  • Subsidise of the cost of connection, or reduce the size of cylinders. To 2-5 kgs.
  • Improve composite material of cylinders.
  • Focus on awareness programmes.
  • Work on challenges related to financing, service reliability, universal coverage, access, safety and cash flow to effectively enable a transition from kerosene to alternative sources.
主题Energy Access
URLhttps://www.ceew.in/publications/reforming-kerosene-subsidies-india
来源智库Council on Energy, Environment and Water (India)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/179653
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Abhishek Jain,Aditya Ramji. Reforming Kerosene Subsidies in India. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
CEEW_Reforming_Keros(115KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
CEEW_Reforming_Keros(1380KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Abhishek Jain]的文章
[Aditya Ramji]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Abhishek Jain]的文章
[Aditya Ramji]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Abhishek Jain]的文章
[Aditya Ramji]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: CEEW_Reforming_Kerosene_Subsidies.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: CEEW_Reforming_Kerosene_Subsidies_in_India_4May16.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。