| 来源类型 | Report |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| A contingency plan for King v. Burwell and related cases | |
| Joseph Antos; James C. Capretta; Lanhee Chen; Yuval Levin; Thomas P. Miller; Ramesh Ponnuru; Avik Roy; Gail Wilensky; David Wilson | |
| 发表日期 | 2015-06-15 |
| 出版年 | 2015 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Abstract: If the Supreme Court sides with the plaintiffs in King v. Burwell and related cases, and thus invalidates the payment of premium subsidies in states that have relied on the federal government to build and run the Affordable Care Act (ACA) insurance exchange, Congress will come under great pressure to enact a remedy to stabilize insurance markets and coverage. Congress should enact such a remedy, including a temporary extension of the existing subsidy program.But it should also allow states to opt into an alternative reform structure, with a simplified tax credit plan and elimination of the ACA’s federal insurance rules. In this alternative, there would be no individual or employer mandate, but individuals who stayed continuously insured would be protected from higher premiums or restricted coverage based on their health status. A contingency plan for King v. Burwell and related cases |
| 主题 | Economics ; Health Economics |
| 标签 | AEI Economic Perspectives ; Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) ; King v. Burwell |
| URL | https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/a-contingency-plan-for-king-v-burwell-and-related-cases/ |
| 来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/206126 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Joseph Antos,James C. Capretta,Lanhee Chen,et al. A contingency plan for King v. Burwell and related cases. 2015. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| A-contingency-plan-f（193KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
