Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Declining fertility in America | |
Lyman Stone | |
发表日期 | 2018-12-17 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Key Points Birth rates in America are declining, which will likely have far-reaching negative economic consequences. American fertility could fall as low as many countries in southern and eastern Europe or East Asia and get as low as 1.5 or 1.4 children per woman. Policymakers must confront the reality that all our long-term obligations will have to be financed with substantially fewer people (or, perhaps, substantially more immigrants) than most actuarial projections assume. Read the full PDF. | Executive Summary Birth rates in America are declining, leading to one of the lowest rates of population growth on record, soon to become the lowest ever. This will likely have far-reaching negative economic consequences. Furthermore, the trend is shared with many industrialized nations and is observed across geographic areas and ethnic groups in the United States, including immigrant women and previously high-fertility states such as Utah and Hawaii. This decline is led by falling birth rates for women under 30, but in recent years, even women in their 30s have seen falling birth rates. These declines will almost certainly result in millennial women ultimately having fewer children than previous generations had. Most of these changes in age-specific birth rates, however, can be attributed to changing marital patterns. Controlling for marital status, fertility in the United States has been roughly stable for the past decade and a half. Most changes in marital status, in turn, can be attributed to the increasing delay in young people getting married. In other words, declining fertility is really about delayed marriage. This trend cannot be reversed with “technological” or “technocratic” solutions. Even significant improvements in reproductive technology would be insufficient to boost fertility to replacement levels, and even significant restrictions of abortion or contraceptives would only modestly alter birth rates. Known environmental factors affecting fertility, such as lead exposure, should be addressed, but even if addressed, they would alter birth rates only modestly. Declining fertility also cannot be reversed by a campaign to alter Americans’ ideals or desires for children. Americans already report high desired fertility, and, indeed, fertility desires are already naturally rising. Americans want to have more children than they are actually having, even among young women. The problem, then, is not about Americans not valuing childbearing, but about barriers to childbearing (and, implicitly, barriers to marriage and independent family formation). These barriers are numerous: Increased young adult debt service costs due to student loans; Decreasing young adult homeownership due to rapidly rising housing costs and student loans; Increasing years spent actively enrolled in educational institutions, which tends to reduce birth rates dramatically while enrolled; Higher cost of market-based childcare, alongside rising need for hired childcare due to diminished extended family support and more two-earner families; and Changed social and cultural expectations of parents and parenting, making children and childbearing more burdensome than for previous generations. Some of these barriers, such as student loan burdens or housing costs, may be readily addressed through various policy changes. Other barriers are more difficult to surmount, such as societal expectations about parenting styles or market norms about years of education required for work. Young families today face a sufficiently wide range of challenges to childbearing, and policy responses are likely to be sufficiently anemic, that a major recovery in fertility seems unlikely. Rather, fertility will likely remain below the historic average until the next recession, when it will plummet even lower. Introduction Around the country, maternity wards are seeing less demand for their services, churches are seeing fewer babies brought in for baptism, and toy stores are struggling to stay in business. Fewer babies are being born in absolute terms and especially in terms of the national birth rate. Depending on how it is measured, birth rates are either at their lowest point in history or approaching it quickly. What is causing this decline? Is it secularism? Economic demoralization? The decline of the family? High housing costs? Explanations for the ongoing baby bust are as numerous as they are panicky. And indeed, figuring out the cause of the decline, and hopefully how to prevent it, is a vital question for policymakers and the nation on the whole. Lower birth rates could mean slower economic growth, insolvent public obligations, and a growing culture of intergenerational despair. Luckily, there is a large amount of research on fertility, so the causes and consequence of the baby bust can be teased out and analyzed. Read the full report.
主题 | Society and Culture |
标签 | birth rate ; children ; fertility ; Fertility rates ; population |
URL | https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/declining-fertility-in-america/ |
来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/206618 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lyman Stone. Declining fertility in America. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Declining-Fertility-(993KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Lyman Stone]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Lyman Stone]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Lyman Stone]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。