G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
College Affordability Update: Value, Price, and Choice in U.S. Higher Education
Beth Akers; Jason D. Delisle
发表日期2019-01-08
出版年2019
语种英语
摘要EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2015, Lumina Foundation introduced the Rule of Ten, a new method for assessing college affordability for students in the U.S. The rule rests on the assumption that an “affordable” cost for college should not exceed the total of: (1) what a student and his family can save by putting away 10% of their income for the 10 years before enrollment; and (2) a student’s earnings, working 10 hours per week while in college. In 2017, we published a report comparing actual student expenses in 2011–12, based on data from the U.S. Department of Education’s National Postsecondary Student Aid Survey (NPSAS), with those recommended by the Rule of Ten. We found that college exceeded the Rule of Ten’s recommended level for most students in the U.S.; that expenses over the rule’s affordability ceiling were paid for by students’ part-time earnings as well as by debt; and that students from the wealthiest households disproportionately attended the highest-cost institutions and amassed the most debt. This paper updates our earlier analysis with the most recent NPSAS data. We find that, in 2015–16, students from the wealthiest households continued to attend the priciest institutions and continued to take on the most debt. This suggests that many students prefer higher short-run costs in exchange for higher expected long-run returns (often in the form of better-paying jobs). Thus, efforts to assess college affordability that ignore long-run returns and focus exclusively on short-run costs paint an incomplete picture of the value delivered to students. Other findings include: In 2015 –16, students seeking bachelor’s degrees faced an average net cost, including living expenses, of about $85,000 for the entirety of their degrees—or about $6,000 more than in 2011–12. In 2015 –16, students seeking associate’s degrees faced an average net cost for their degrees of about $22,000—essentially unchanged from 2011–12. In 2015–16, students from households in the highest income quartile (those with incomes above $120,000) borrowed about $10,500 more than students from households in the lowest income quartile (those with incomes below $30,000). In 2011–12, the borrowing gap was $7,500. Between 2011–12 and 2015–16, college became slightly more affordable, as measured by the Rule of Ten, for students seeking bachelor’s degrees as well as associate’s degrees. 
主题Higher Education
标签College costs ; Higher education ; Student debt
URLhttps://www.aei.org/research-products/report/college-affordability-update-value-price-and-choice-in-u-s-higher-education/
来源智库American Enterprise Institute (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/206623
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Beth Akers,Jason D. Delisle. College Affordability Update: Value, Price, and Choice in U.S. Higher Education. 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
IB-BA-0119.pdf(2617KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Beth Akers]的文章
[Jason D. Delisle]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Beth Akers]的文章
[Jason D. Delisle]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Beth Akers]的文章
[Jason D. Delisle]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: IB-BA-0119.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。