| 来源类型 | Report |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| Education reform’s deep blue hue: Are school reformers right-wingers or centrists — or neither? | |
| Jay P. Greene; Frederick M. Hess | |
| 发表日期 | 2019-03-11 |
| 出版年 | 2019 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Key Points Depictions of school reform have become remarkably detached from the reality of who populates the education-reform world. Although school reform is routinely portrayed as a right-wing enterprise and the education-reform community defends itself as bipartisan, school reformers are decidedly left-leaning, with 87 percent or more of the political contributions by staff at school-reform organizations going to Democratic candidates and causes. Political giving by school reformers and reform-minded scholars is about as one-sided as that in other liberal precincts, such as Hollywood and public-employee unions, which suggests that education reformers are far more left-leaning than the nation’s educators are. The lopsided political makeup of education reform risks creating an echo chamber, hinders reform efforts in red and purple states, and can create challenges when anticipating and addressing the concerns of right-leaning constituencies. Read the full PDF. Introduction Close observers of 21st-century education reform know that champions of charter schooling, teacher evaluation, and accountability are routinely characterized as right-wingers bent on undermining public education. Thus, the education-reform battles tend to be depicted as left versus right or blue versus red, with progressive teachers unions and their allies fending off the attacks of right-wing reformers. These tropes are omnipresent. The most visible symbols of education reform—such as Teach for America and various charter school networks and the foundations that fund them—are characterized as neoliberal, corporatist, conservative, and right-wing. In the Atlantic, the KIPP charter schools have been attacked for their role “in the project of neoliberalizing public goods.”1 Success Academies founder Eva Moskowitz has been excoriated for promoting a Trojan horse that contains “Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos.”2 The Walton Family Foundation has been dismissed as “conservative” or “deeply conservative” by the Huffington Post3 and historian Diane Ravitch.4 Regarding Teach for America (TFA), Rethinking Schools has published “An Open Letter to New Teach for America Recruits,” which reads: “Many of you no doubt believe you are joining a progressive education justice movement; that is the message TFA sells so well. But TFA is not progressive. The data-driven pedagogy, the fast-track preparation, the union-busting, the forced exploitation of your labor, the deep-pocketed affiliation with corporate education reform are all very conservative, very anti-progressive ideas.”5 Meanwhile, education-reform advocates describe their efforts as bipartisan, nonpartisan, and centrist. For instance, Chiefs for Change describes itself as a “bipartisan network of diverse state and district education Chiefs.”6 Stand for Children touts its “bold independence” and bills itself as “non-partisan and child-focused.”7 Advocacy group 50CAN explains that it is a “nonpartisan, research-backed organization driven forward by the work of a talented, energetic and diverse staff.”8 As one Teach for America board member put it a couple years ago, “We’re not living in pragmatic centrist times, but TFA is a pragmatic, centrist-oriented solution.”9 So, who is right? Is 21st-century education reform a right-wing project or a purple, bipartisan one? Well, if one considers the candidates whom education reformers support for public office, the answer turns out to be neither. While it is not practicable to examine the voting habits or partisan affiliations of education reformers, we can identify the candidates and political causes to which they contribute. And the pattern of their political giving suggests that the people who work at the education-reform organizations supported by the biggest and best-known education-reform foundations support almost uniformly left-leaning. In other words, education reform turns out to be neither a red nor a purple enterprise—but a deep blue one. Of course, after a moment’s reflection, this ought not be so surprising. Teach for America chapters, charter school groups, and education-advocacy groups such as the Education Trust and Stand for Children have gone out of their way in recent years to demonstrate their progressive bona fides (and disagreement with Republicans) on issues such as immigration,10 school discipline,11 transgender access,12 and school vouchers.13 In this new analysis, which examines the political campaign contributions from those most active in education reform, we find that the movement is populated by individuals who support Democratic candidates for public office. The bottom line: The leading participants in the school-reform “wars” are mostly engaged in an intramural brawl, one between union-allied Democrats and a strand of progressive Democrats more intent on changing school systems. Read the full report. Notes |
| 主题 | Education |
| 标签 | Democratic Party ; education ; liberal ; school |
| URL | https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/education-reforms-deep-blue-hue-are-school-reformers-right-wingers-or-centrists-or-neither/ |
| 来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/206648 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jay P. Greene,Frederick M. Hess. Education reform’s deep blue hue: Are school reformers right-wingers or centrists — or neither?. 2019. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| Education-Reforms-De（2417KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
