G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型评论
UN Human Rights Panel Needs Some Entry Standards
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick (1926-2006)
发表日期2003-05-14
出版年2003
语种英语
摘要The absence of prerequisites for membership has created a United Nations Commission on Human Rights in which many of the world’s worst human rights abusers sit in judgment on governments that have long institutionalized the rule of law and respect for individual rights and fundamental freedoms. The Human Rights Commission recently met in Geneva for six weeks to discuss, debate and decide issues concerning “the situation of human rights in the world.” Since no standards exist, Libya was permitted to hold the chair, which resulted in a commission filled with an assortment of world-class rights abusers, including Syria, Sudan, Sierra Leone, and Uganda. Occasionally the discussions at the commission illuminate problems that exist in the world. More often they reflect the balance of power that exists within the United Nations. Last year the United States, a founding member, was denied a seat and a vote on the Human Rights Commission and was replaced by Syria. All manner of explanations were offered to account for this anomaly, but it came down to the fact that not enough members of the commission had voted for a U.S. presence. This year, however, the United States received the votes necessary for re-election for a three-year term, presumably because the U.S. delegation, which I headed, did more energetic lobbying and our colleagues understood that the United States might withdraw its membership in the commission if the trend toward defeating democratic governments and preferring dictatorships persisted. Another striking and unexpected aspect of the meeting was that Russia voted almost exactly as it had during the Cold War, in association with the same countries–almost all of which were the dictatorships present in the commission. .Equally interesting and much more encouraging was the high level of consensus and solidarity among the democratic states–except, alas, on issues involving Israel. Cuba provided the greatest irony for the session this year. While the Human Rights Commission was meeting in Geneva, Fidel Castro’s government was sentencing 75 Cuban teachers, doctors, journalists and librarians to prison terms of 12 to 26 years, at trials lasting less than a day each. Given the age of most of those tried, the term imposed amounted to a life sentence. .In addition to harsh punishment for the crime of dissent, the Cuban government organized a hasty trial and execution of three men who had attempted to hijack a ferry to Florida. As usual, representatives of the Cuban government blamed the United States for luring Cubans to American shores, instead of asking themselves why so many Cubans are so eager to leave their homeland. As shocking as Castro’s repression was, the fact that the Human Rights Commission took no action to express disapproval of the Cuban government’s violation of the human rights of its citizens was more shocking still. All the commission did was urge “the government of Cuba to receive the personal representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights” and decide to consider the matter further next year. No resolution was passed condemning repression in Chechnya, or slavery and repression in Sudan, or murder and violation of rights in Zimbabwe, or the continued victimization of the Falun Gong in China. This is a scandal. Free people in open forums should not fail to protest brutal treatment of helpless citizens at the hands of ruthless governments. That is, after all, the traditional function of the Human Rights Commission. Clearly, democratic states still suffer discrimination inside the United Nations and the Human Rights Commission. As the world and the United States evaluate the role of the United Nations in the wake of the Iraq war, it is time to assess the role of the Human Rights Commission as well. If the United Nations wants to be taken seriously on this and other issues, it must set some standards. Is it so ludicrous to require that those sitting in judgment of the human rights practices of others must first themselves respect human rights? Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, senior fellow at AEI, headed the U.S. delegation to the UN Human Rights Commission meeting in Geneva from March 16 to April 26.
主题Foreign and Defense Policy
标签Geneva ; human rights ; Iraq ; Jeane Kirkpatrick ; United Nations (UN)
URLhttps://www.aei.org/articles/un-human-rights-panel-needs-some-entry-standards/
来源智库American Enterprise Institute (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/238584
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick . UN Human Rights Panel Needs Some Entry Standards. 2003.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jeane J. Kirkpatrick (1926-2006)]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jeane J. Kirkpatrick (1926-2006)]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jeane J. Kirkpatrick (1926-2006)]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。