Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 评论 |
Truth vs. social justice | |
Jim Talent | |
发表日期 | 2016-10-25 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | I have in these pages sometimes referred to Heterodox Academy, an organization of scholars devoted to intellectual diversity in the social sciences. Recently Jonathan Haidt — a prominent member of Heterodox — lectured at Yale University on the ongoing transformation of universities from organizations devoted to Truth to organizations devoted to social justice. Haidt is a social psychologist who has written extensively on how human beings reach conclusions, especially on issues of morality. His book The Righteous Mind argued that people reach conclusions not primarily through reason but through moral intuition developed apart from reason; then they use their reason to rationalize the conclusions already reached. Haidt’s Yale lecture explains what is happening on campuses today as thoroughly as anything I’ve seen. It’s long but moves quickly and covers a lot. Haidt explains why intellectual diversity is necessary to truth, why a “culture of victimhood” has developed on campus, the danger of trigger warnings, the new blasphemy in the higher academy, and why social justice is often so unjust. I urge readers to watch it. It will take a lot less time than a Presidential debate, and Haidt and his colleagues at Heterodox are breaking important ground. |
主题 | Education ; Foreign and Defense Policy ; Higher Education |
标签 | competition of ideas ; Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies ; political correctness |
URL | https://www.aei.org/articles/truth-vs-social-justice/ |
来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/261335 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jim Talent. Truth vs. social justice. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Jim Talent]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Jim Talent]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Jim Talent]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。