| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 评论 |
| Is the Supreme Court’s job to defer? | |
| Peter J. Wallison | |
| 发表日期 | 2019-06-30 |
| 出版年 | 2019 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | The Supreme Court last week decided an important case in a way that left many observers confused about what it had actually done. At issue in Kisor v. Wilkie was whether to overturn Auer v. Robbins (1997), which held that lower courts must defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of their own rules. The justices voted unanimously to send the case back to the lower court, which had invoked Auer deference in approving a Veterans Affairs Department interpretation of its own rule. The majority opinion, written by Justice Elena Kagan, added a complicated set of considerations before a court could defer to an agency’s rule. In effect this new rule replaced Auer deference. |
| 主题 | Politics and Public Opinion ; Courts |
| 标签 | Chief Justice John Roberts ; legal ; Supreme Court |
| URL | https://www.aei.org/articles/supreme-courts-job-defer/ |
| 来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/266057 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Peter J. Wallison. Is the Supreme Court’s job to defer?. 2019. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Peter J. Wallison]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Peter J. Wallison]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Peter J. Wallison]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
