| 来源类型 | Article
|
| 规范类型 | 评论
|
| Democratic debates: The good, the bad, and the meh |
| Sean Trende
|
| 发表日期 | 2019-08-01
|
| 出版年 | 2019
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | It’s impossible to rate, in a sensible fashion, all 20 (!!!) Democratic contenders who made the debate stage in Detroit, so I will start by noting that though many of the low-polling candidates – the one-percenters, as I like to call them – had credible performances, that this is not enough for them. Yes, Mayor Bill de Blasio and Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand and Michael Bennet had their moments, but it is hard to see these debates generating much momentum for them. Basically, if a candidate isn’t listed below, he or she didn’t make much of an impression, and is probably fits into the “losers” category.
In a strange way, though, the preceding paragraph succinctly sets out the real story about what happened Tuesday and Wednesday night. Remember, this two-stage debate will have relatively little to do with who the eventual nominee is, but it will have a substantial impact on who the nominee is not. To qualify for the third match-up(s) in September, candidates have to have 130,000 individual donors and reach a threshold of 2 percent in four polls. The Detroit debates were the best chance for candidates to raise their profiles and clear those bars; to the extent they do not, their candidacies are probably over.
Winners
Losers
Meh
TBD
|
| 主题 | Politics and Public Opinion
; Elections
; Executive Branch
; Polls
; Society and Culture
|
| 标签 | Bernie Sanders
; debate
; Elections
; Elizabeth Warren
; joe biden
; Presidential Election
; Public opinion polls
|
| URL | https://www.aei.org/articles/democratic-debates-the-good-the-bad-and-the-meh/
|
| 来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/266213
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Sean Trende. Democratic debates: The good, the bad, and the meh. 2019.
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
