| 来源类型 | Working papers
|
| 规范类型 | 论文
|
| Direct vs indirect payments for environmental services |
| Groom, Ben; Palmer, Charles
|
| 发表日期 | 2008
|
| 出版者 | Environmental Economy and Policy Research Group
|
| 出版年 | 2008
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | Ferraro and Simpson (2002) argue that when markets are competitive, direct payments for environmental services are more cost effective in achieving environmental goals than indirect payments, say, for capital. However, when eco-entrepreneurs face non-price rationing in input or output markets, as is typical for e.g. credit in developing countries for, we show that interventions which relax constraints can be more cost-effective than direct payments. One corollary of this is that such indirect payments can be preferred to direct payments by interveners (e.g. NGOs) and eco-entrepreneurs alike. Both of these outcomes are more likely when constraints are severe. |
| URL | https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/13518
|
| 来源智库 | Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (Switzerland)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/266551
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Groom, Ben,Palmer, Charles. Direct vs indirect payments for environmental services. 2008.
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
