Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Issue Brief |
规范类型 | 简报 |
Using Accountability | |
Florence Daviet | |
发表日期 | 2014-04 |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Executive SummaryThe global effort to save forests in developing countries, known as “REDD+,” would benefit from a set of tools that hold governments to account for their commitments. These accountability tools need to be integrated into national REDD+ programs. A set of accountability tools affecting the reputational, financial, and legal interests of the government at the national and subnational levels would enable oversight institutions, individuals, and civil society to hold governments to account for the objectives that REDD+ programs hope to achieve. In particular, oversight actors need accountability tools to uphold social and environmental objectives beyond emission reductions in order to change the status quo required to achieve REDD+. |
结论 | The author found that accountability tools had at least one of three main functions: bringing actors to the table to negotiate reforms, protecting people or the environment during the design and implementation of laws and policies, and giving oversight actors the ability to enforce the implementation of agreed rules. In each case, several factors played a role in the successful use of accountability tools, including the clarity of the relevant laws, the strength of oversight institutions, and the strength of the economic incentive. Based on this research, we make the following suggestions to government and civil society actors participating in the design of national REDD+ programs:
|
摘要 | This issue brief explores the complicated realities of how accountability tools functioned in land-use planning, zoning, and permitting processes in a pair of case studies from Brazil and Indonesia and draws lessons for government or civil society designers of REDD+ programs. One case study focuses on how presidential decrees on land zoning are helping oversight actors achieve political accountability in Mato Grosso, Brazil. The other examines the role of the Indonesian primary forest and peat land conversion moratorium on the oil palm permitting process. |
主题 | Forests ; Governance |
标签 | brazil ; forests ; governance ; indonesia |
区域 | Brazil ; Indonesia |
URL | https://www.wri.org/publication/using-accountability |
来源智库 | World Resources Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/27889 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Florence Daviet. Using Accountability. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Florence Daviet]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Florence Daviet]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Florence Daviet]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。