G2TT
来源类型Book
规范类型其他
ISBN9780815753094
The Great Curriculum Debate
其他题名How Should We Teach Reading and Math?
Tom Loveless
发表日期2001-11-01
出版者Brookings Institution Press, November 1, 2001
出版年2001
语种英语
摘要
curriculum_debate

Since the early twentieth century, American educators have been engaged in a heated debate over what schools should teach and how they should teach it. The partisans—”education progressives” and “education traditionalists”—have usually kept their disagreements within the walls of the nation’s schools of education. Periodically, however, arguments have erupted which have generated headlines and attracted public attention, making clear the potential for bitterness and rancor in education politics. In the 1990s, progressives and traditionalists squared off in a dispute over reading and mathematics. Arguments over how best to teach these two subjects is detailed in The Great Curriculum Debate: How Should We Teach Reading and Math? This book includes contributions from distinguished scholars from both sides of the debate, as well as influential nonpartisans. The proponents of “whole language” and “phonics” present their opposing views on reading. Advocates and opponents of “NCTM math reform”—the agenda of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)—discuss their differing opinions about math. Although the authors disagree on many of the most important aspects of learning, they agree on one point: the school curriculum matters. Decisions made now about the content of reading and mathematics will have long term consequences, not only for students and schools, but for society as a whole. Contributors include E. D. Hirsch Jr. (University of Virginia), Gail Burrill (Mathematical Sciences Education Board), Michael T. Battista (Kent State University), David C. Geary (University of Missouri, Columbia), Roger Shouse (Penn State University), Adam Gamoran (University of Wisconsin, Madison), Richard Askey (University of Wisconsin, Madison), Diane Ravitch (New York University), Catherine E. Snow (Harvard University), Margaret Moustafa (California State University, LA), Richard L. Allington (University of Florida), William Lowe Boyd (Penn State University), and Douglas E. Mitchell (University of California, Riverside).

URLhttps://www.brookings.edu/book/the-great-curriculum-debate/
来源智库Brookings Institution (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/285362
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Tom Loveless. The Great Curriculum Debate. 2001.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
b73aafef82178bf56eb9(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Tom Loveless]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Tom Loveless]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Tom Loveless]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: b73aafef82178bf56eb9487c124ccad11c931bf1.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。