G2TT
来源类型Papers
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26889/9781784670481
Fiscal Stabilization in Oil and Gas Contracts – Evidence and Implications
Carole Nakhle
发表日期2016-01-07
出版年2016
页码7
语种英语
概述The objective of this paper is to analyse how contractual stabilization devices have evolved since the late 1990s, based on a survey of 20 countries and a review of the literature and evidence on stabilization clauses. Although fiscal stability is a commonly cited attribute of a desirable upstream petroleum regime, one of the commonly observed […]
摘要The objective of this paper is to analyse how contractual stabilization devices have evolved since the late 1990s, based on a survey of 20 countries and a review of the literature and evidence on stabilization clauses. Although fiscal stability is a commonly cited attribute of a desirable upstream petroleum regime, one of the commonly observed features of existing regimes is the lack of stability. The paper studies the major triggers that push host governments to revise the fiscal terms to which they originally agreed with investors; amongst various economic and political factors, one of the obvious drivers is the oil price. Chasing the price of oil, however, is a burdensome and inefficient strategy, as oil is an internationally traded commodity where short-term price volatility is the norm. The paper’s three broad conclusions include: First, classical stabilization models have not been successful in practice; Second, the more modern clauses are more likely to treat changes in fiscal terms symmetrically, and may be equally beneficial to governments and oil companies; Third, modern stabilization clauses can allow policymakers to consider the overall tax system and its impact on revenue and growth, without worrying about the specific impact on the oil and gas sector, and without penalizing investors in the sector. Fiscal stability clauses in developing countries will remain a key feature of contractual agreements and oil and gas laws for years to come. However, the effectiveness of the more modern clauses in achieving the desired outcome remains as questionable as that of previous stability models, particularly in countries which continue to lack the administrative capability to enforce these mechanisms, and where government policy in general and investment laws and the judiciary in particular lack credibility.
主题Energy Policy ; Finance ; Gas ; Oil
关键词Economic Equilibrium Clauses Fiscal Stabilisation Freezing Clauses Investment Oil and Gas Contract Oil and Gas Law oil price Petroleum Fiscal Regime SP 37 SP37
URLhttps://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/fiscal-stabilization-in-oil-and-gas-contracts-evidence-and-implications/
来源智库Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (United Kingdom)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/312389
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Carole Nakhle. Fiscal Stabilization in Oil and Gas Contracts – Evidence and Implications. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Fiscal-Stabilization(1978KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Carole Nakhle]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Carole Nakhle]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Carole Nakhle]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Fiscal-Stabilization-in-Oil-and-Gas-Contracts-SP-37.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。