Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Opinion paper |
规范类型 | 评论 |
来源ID | 17110IIED |
Aren’t we all vulnerable: why do vulnerability analysis? | |
Marcus Moench | |
发表日期 | 2011 |
出处 | Sustainable Development Opinion Papers |
出版者 | IIED |
出版年 | 2011 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The idea of ‘vulnerability’ is widely used shorthand for the disproportionate impacts that climate change will have on high-risk groups and fragile ecosystems. Decision makers increasingly want to target adaptation funding to those people and environments most affected by climate change. They must also be able to monitor the effectiveness of their investments. Vulnerability analysis is sometimes presented as the solution to these wants and needs — but existing approaches are often of little use. In this opinion, Marcus Moench suggests that to be truly useful as a basis for dialogue, action and accountability, the meaning of ‘vulnerability’ must be clarified and the methods for analysing it greatly strengthened. This means establishing standard, replicable approaches that differentiate between the roles and exposure of stakeholders, systems and institutions. |
URL | https://pubs.iied.org/17110IIED/?c=climate&p=42 |
来源智库 | International Institute for Environment and Development (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/316511 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Marcus Moench. Aren’t we all vulnerable: why do vulnerability analysis?. 2011. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
17110IIED.pdf(151KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Marcus Moench]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Marcus Moench]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Marcus Moench]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。