G2TT
来源类型Popular Press
规范类型评论
Harness Property Rights to Protect Beaches
Reed Watson
发表日期2014-06-23
出版年2014
语种英语
概述Trampling the property rights of beachfront landowners in the name of public access is no way to encourage beach conservation.
正文Eliminating beach access is no way to make friends. Just ask Vinod Khosla, the Sun Microsystems co-founder whose popularity fell to Donald Sterling levels after he closed the only road to Martin’s Beach, a cliff-rimmed surf break on California’s Half Moon Bay. But trampling the property rights of beachfront landowners in the name of public access is no way to encourage beach conservation either. The road Khosla closed runs through his property and one court has already upheld his right to lock the gate. People tend to take care of the things they own and neglect the things they don’t. That’s why no rational person in the history of the world ever changed the oil in a rental car. The same is true of beaches. Insisting on a policy of unlimited public access to all beaches everywhere achieves only one objective: the maximum use of every beach. Other worthwhile objectives, such as preserving the pristine character of certain beaches or maximizing the quality of each beach visitor’s experience, fall to the wayside. In some locations along California’s coast, locals already exclude non-locals from the best surf breaks to prevent congestion and destruction of the value of the resource — the waves. Separately, some entrepreneurial beachfront landowners charge fees for parking and other amenities, as did the previous owners of Khosla’s property. Excluding outsiders can be difficult however, particularly when the law mandates open access. As a result, the cost of accessing these “free” public beaches is queuing, crowding and conflict. Aside from eliminating the subsidies for coastal flood insurance, which encourages dense and risky coastal development, respecting the property rights of beachfront landowners — even the billionaires — is the best way to prevent congestion, maximize the quality of beach experiences and ensure long-term beach conservation. This link between secure property rights and environmental conservation is the essence of free market environmentalism, and it might also explain why Khosla, a green tech investor and renowned environmental advocate, purchased the land adjacent to Martin’s beach. Originally appeared inThe New York Timeson Monday, June 23, 2014.
主题Private Lands ; Water
URLhttps://www.perc.org/2014/06/23/harness-property-rights-to-protect-beaches/
来源智库Property and Environment Research Center (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/360055
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Reed Watson. Harness Property Rights to Protect Beaches. 2014.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Reed Watson]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Reed Watson]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Reed Watson]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。