G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
The Use of Environmental and Social Criteria in Export Credit Agencies‘ Practices
Markus Knigge; Benjamin Görlach; Caroline Nuffort; R. Andreas Kraemer
发表日期2003
出版年2003
语种英语
概述Export Credit Agencies’ Environmental Guidelines with Reference to the World Commission on DamsThis study surveys the environmental guidelines of eight OECD member states' export credit agencies. Special emphasis was given to the support of large dams; in this context, the study evaluates to what extent the recommendations made by the World Commission on Dams are reflected in the environmental and social guidelines.
摘要class="field field-name-field-pub-title-additions field-type-text field-label-hidden">
Export Credit Agencies’ Environmental Guidelines with Reference to the World Commission on Dams

This study surveys the environmental guidelines of eight OECD member states' export credit agencies. Special emphasis was given to the support of large dams; in this context, the study evaluates to what extent the recommendations made by the World Commission on Dams are reflected in the environmental and social guidelines.

The study seeks to determine inter alia:

  • the way in which (i.e. according to which criteria) project applications are assessed;
  • the role of stakeholder interest and involvement;
  • which information about projects should be accessible, and at which point in time this information should be made available.

The study comes to the conclusion that in recent years the ECAs from all countries examined have made significant progress with the integration of environmental and social interests in their lending practices. For instance, large projects are all subject to regular environmental assessments, which are either conducted by the ECAs or by an external environmental consultant. However, disclosure policy represents an issue where room for improvement remains. While a several ECAs have introduced ex-ante disclosure policies, others only publish information about decisions that have been taken. However, effective stakeholder participation can only be achieved if the public has access to detailed information well ahead of the final decision.

The study concludes with an overview of the impact of the World Commission on Dams on Export Credit Agencies and a series of suggestions as to how the WCD recommendations can be better integrated into the lending practices of ECAs.

The findings of the study have been summarised in a 54-page project report and is available for download.

目录Table of Contents: Executive Summary Zusammenfassung 1     Introduction 1.1      Background 1.2      Scope of the Study 1.3      Methods and Approaches 1.4      Preview of the Structure 2     Background to the Study 2.1      The World Commission on Dams 2.1.1   Composition 2.1.2   The WCD Framework for Decision-Making 2.1.3   WCD Framework Reactions 2.1.4   UNEP's Dams and Development Project 2.2      Export Credit Agencies 2.2.1   Export Credit Agencies and Dams 2.2.2   ECAs Defined 2.2.3   OECD Reform 2.2.4   Civil Society Critique 2.2.5   Existing Body of Research 3     Survey of Environmental Guidelines in Selected OECD Countries 3.1      Screening 3.2      Thresholds and Exemption Criteria 3.3      Monitoring of Compliance 3.4      Exclusion Criteria 3.5      Transparency and Information Disclosure 3.6      Public Participation 3.7      Environmental, Social and Corruption Guidelines 3.8      Overview Table 4     Experiences with Implementing Environmental Guidelines 4.1      Australia: EFIC 4.2      Canada: EDC 4.3      France: Coface 4.4      Germany: Euler Hermes 4.5      Japan: JBIC 4.6      Norway: GIEK 4.7      Switzerland: ERG 4.8      United Kingdom: ECGD 4.9      United States of America: Ex-Im Bank 5     Discussion and Analysis of Results 5.1      Overview of the Main Findings 5.2      The Impact of the WCD Recommendations 5.3      Transparency and Disclosure Policy 5.4      Costs of Incorporating Environmental and Social Aspects 5.5      Outlook and Perspectives 5.6      Limitations and Caveats 6     Conclusions 7     References 7.1      Literature 7.2      Additional Sources 7.3      Links
标签Report ; Investment ; Trade
URLhttps://www.ecologic.eu/12842
来源智库Ecologic Institute (Germany)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36277
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Markus Knigge,Benjamin Görlach,Caroline Nuffort,等. The Use of Environmental and Social Criteria in Export Credit Agencies‘ Practices. 2003.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Markus Knigge]的文章
[Benjamin Görlach]的文章
[Caroline Nuffort]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Markus Knigge]的文章
[Benjamin Görlach]的文章
[Caroline Nuffort]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Markus Knigge]的文章
[Benjamin Görlach]的文章
[Caroline Nuffort]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。