全球智库信息集成服务系统(G2TT): A Comparative Evaluation of Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships for Urban Water Services in ACP Countries

G2TT

来源类型	Report
规范类型	报告
	A Comparative Evaluation of Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships for Urban Water Services in ACP Countries
	Dr. Darla N. Nickel; Thomas Thaler
发表日期	2010
出版者	European Parliament, Committee on Development (EP DEVE)
出版年	2010
语种	英语
概述	EU water policy under the 10th European Development Fund has shifted its focus away from Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in water management in ACP countries towards Public- Public (PuP) Partnerships. PUPs are new partnerships developed between public water operators, communities, trade unions and other key groups, without profit motive and on a basis of equality. The Overseas Development Institute (Josephine Tucker and Roger Calow) and Ecologic Institute (Darla Nickel and Thomas Thaler) conducted a study for the European Parliament that provided an evaluation of the comparative advantage of different partnership approaches in water policy.
摘要	class="field field-name-field-master-image field-type-image field-label-hidden"> EU water policy under the 10th European Development Fund has shifted its focus away from Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in water management in ACP countries towards Public- Public (PuP) Partnerships. PUPs are new partnerships developed between public water operators, communities, trade unions and other key groups, without profit motive and on a basis of equality. The Overseas Development Institute (Josephine Tucker and Roger Calow) and Ecologic Institute (Darla Nickel and Thomas Thaler) conducted a study for the European Parliament that provided an evaluation of the comparative advantage of different partnership approaches in water policy. The study A Comparative Evaluation of Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships for Urban Water Services in ACP Countries [pdf, 980 KB, English], conducted by the Overseas Development Institute (link is external) and Ecologic Institute, provides an evaluation of different partnership approaches in water policy. It is based on a literature review of published and unpublished research (econometric analyses, case studies and review papers), and an in-depth examination of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and Public-Public Partnerships (PuPs) in Ghana and South Africa.
目录	Table of Contents: INTRODUCTION 1.1 PPPs and PuPs: a brief history 1.2 Defining PPPs and PuPs: a typology of partnerships 1.3 Approach of the study and structure of the report 2 PERFORMANCE OF PPPS AND PUPS: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 2.1 How have PPPs performed in Africa? 2.2 How do PuPs compare? 2.3 Barriers and enablers for successful partnerships 3 CASE STUDY: GHANA 3.1 Context 3.2 The Ghana Water/Aqua Vitens Rand Ltd PPP 3.3 The Savelugu Community PuP arrangement 3.4 Discussion and lessons 4 CASE STUDY: SOUTH AFRICA 4.1 Context 4.2 The Harrismith PuP with Rand Water 4.3 The Nelspruit / Mbombela concession 4.4 Discussion and lessons 5 CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS 5.1 Comparing PPPs and PuPs 5.2 Broader Lessons 5.3 Past EC development support in water and sanitation: lessons for PPPs and PuPs 5.4 Final remarks 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY 6.1 Interviews conducted
标签	Report ; Development ; Foreign Policy ; Governance ; Water
关键词	Water water supply public private partnerships public public partnerships millennium development goals ACP Countries (African Caribbean and Pacific group of states) Europe Africa Caribbean Pacific
URL	https://www.ecologic.eu/11957
来源智库	Ecologic Institute (Germany)
资源类型	智库出版物
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36383
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Dr. Darla N. Nickel,Thomas Thaler. A Comparative Evaluation of Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships for Urban Water Services in ACP Countries. 2010.