全球智库信息集成服务系统(G2TT): Methodologies for Climate Proofing Investments and Measures under Cohesion and Regional Policy and the Common Agricultural Policy

G2TT

来源类型	Report
规范类型	报告
	Methodologies for Climate Proofing Investments and Measures under Cohesion and Regional Policy and the Common Agricultural Policy
	Jenny Tröltzsch; Dr. Ana Frelih-Larsen
发表日期	2012
出版年	2012
语种	英语
概述	This study developed a detailed assessment of the potential threats, risks, damage costs, and existing adaptive capacities of Member States in the realm of the CAP and Cohesion Policy, as well as an appraisal of options and strategies through which the CAP and Cohesion Policy can adapt to a changing climate. The study makes recommendations and offers guidance to public authorities in Member States on how to mainstream climate into and climate proof expenditures and measures under Cohesion Policy and the CAP. The study findings are of direct relevance for the programming of CAP and Cohesion Policy expenditures under the next EU Multi-Annual Financial Framework from 2014 to 2020. The final report is available for download.
摘要	class="field field-name-field-master-image field-type-image field-label-hidden"> This study developed a detailed assessment of the potential threats, risks, damage costs, and existing adaptive capacities of Member States in the realm of the CAP and Cohesion Policy, as well as an appraisal of options and strategies through which the CAP and Cohesion Policy can adapt to a changing climate. The study makes recommendations and offers guidance to public authorities in Member States on how to mainstream climate into and climate proof expenditures and measures under Cohesion Policy and the CAP. The study findings are of direct relevance for the programming of CAP and Cohesion Policy expenditures under the next EU Multi-Annual Financial Framework from 2014 to 2020. The final report is available for download. The Cohesion Policy and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) account for the large majority of EU spending and have a major impact on the development of EU's urban and rural economies, infrastructures and ecosystems and their services. These two policy areas can substantially support adaptation in the EU by ensuring that investments and spending under both policies are robust in their effectiveness and value under different climate change scenarios, i.e. they are "climate-proof". The study drew on a variety of information sources, including numerous interviews with policy - makers and public stakeholders at the EU and national level and three dedicated workshops that took place in different parts of the EU. The Ecologic Institute was responsible for the economic assessment of adaptation options, as well as contributed to the assessment of opportunities under CAP and technical guidance for the CAP. The final report [in English] is available on this website for download and can be also found on the European Commission's DG Climate website. Infographic above taken from: Medarova-Bergstrom, K. and Volkery, A. (2012): Practical Options for Climate Change Mainstreaming in the 2014-2020 EU Budget report, Brussels/London
目录	Table of Contents: Key findings and recommendationsExecutive SummaryGLOSSARY1 Introduction 1.1 Background and policy context 1.2 Main intervention logic of the work carried out under the project 1.3 Key conceptual approaches 1.3.1 Defining Vulnerability 1.3.2 Defining climate proofing and mainstreaming 1.4 Structure of this report2 Climate Change Threats, Impacts and Damage Costs 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Important methodological issues 2.2.1 Defining regions 2.2.2 The relative importance of direct and indirect expenditure 2.3 Overview of climate change threats and impacts and associated damage costs 2.3.1 Most significant threats from climate change 2.3.2 Regional variation of most significant threats from climate change 2.3.3 Damage costs of most significant climate change threats on regional development 2.3.4 The indicative impacts of threats on receptors 2.3.5 Affected Cohesion Policy and CAP expenditures 2.3.6 Summary of the main impacts and conclusions 2.4 Assessing the adaptive capacities of Member States 2.4.1 Approach to assessing adaptive capacity 2.4.2 Results on adaptive capacity 2.5 Baseline: Development and assessment 2.5.1 Methodological approach 2.5.2 Summary of baselines3 Options and instruments for climate mainstreaming and proofing of CAP and Cohesion Policy 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Appraisal of adaptation options 3.2.1 Typology of adaptation options 3.2.2 Overview of relevant options 3.2.3 Adaptation options: Cost and benefits (including analysis of impacts) and their role for mainstreaming and climate-proofing CP and CAP 3.2.4 Overall conclusions and success factors and barriers for the implementation of options Appraisal of instruments 3.3 to better integrate climate-proofing concerns into funds programming 3.3.1 Introduction 3.3.2 High level assessment of EU policies and instruments 3.3.3 Detailed assessment of short-listed policies and instruments4 Policy assessment of 2014-2020 Cohesion Policy 4.1 Background and policy context 4.2 Ex-ante appraisal: Analysis of the relevance of EU Cohesion Policy to climate change adaptation and scope for integration of climate change adaptation 4.2.1 Needs for climate proofing future expenditure under Cohesion Policy 4.2.2 Opportunities and constraints for climate change proofing future expenditure 4.2.3 Barriers and success factors for climate proofing future Cohesion Policy 4.3 Solutions and policy recommendations5 Policy assessment of the 2014-2020 CAP: addressing Climate Adaptation priorities and Needs 5.1 Background and Policy Context 5.1.1 The CAP 2007-13 5.1.2 The CAP post 2014 5.2 Ex Ante Appraisal 5.2.1 Funding provisions for adaptation options 5.2.2 Procedural / implementing requirements and provisions 5.2.3 Summary of gaps and opportunities 5.3 Common barriers and issues affecting the successful integration of climate adaptation needs within the CAP 5.3.1 Political barriers 5.3.2 Institutional barriers 5.3.3 Financial barriers 5.3.4 Integrated planning and delivery 5.3.5 Information availability 5.3.6 Knowledge transfer 5.4 Solutions and policy recommendations6 Capacity needs and guidance 6.1 Background and approach 6.2 Cohesion Policy: Capacity needs assessment and conclusions 6.2.1 Shortcomings and capacity needs for Cohesion Policy 6.2.2 Conclusions for Cohesion Policy 6.3 CAP: Capacity needs assessment and conclusions 6.3.1 Shortcomings and capacity needs for CAP 6.3.2 Conclusions for CAP7 References8 Annex 1: Summary of Receptor Reports 8.1 Climate impacts on economic sectors and systems 8.1.1 Agriculture 8.1.2 Forestry 8.1.3 Transport 8.1.4 Construction and buildings 8.1.5 Energy Supply 8.1.6 Tourism 8.1.7 Insurance 8.2 Climate impacts on environmental systems 8.2.1 Soil and biodiversity 8.2.2 Water infrastructure 8.3 Climate impacts on key geographical areas 8.3.1 Coastal zones 8.3.2 River Flooding 8.4 Social issues 8.4.1 Health 8.4.2 Employment9 Annex 2: Assessing the adaptive capacities of Member States 9.1.1 Approach to assessing adaptive capacity10 Annex 3 Adaptive capacity for Cohesion Policy11 Annex 4 Adaptive capacity indicators for CAP12 Annex 5: Baseline – Approach and results by Member State (Move to supplementary report) 12.1 Methodological approach 12.2 Baseline assessment for the Mediterranean 12.2.1 Baseline for Spain 12.2.2 Baseline for Portugal 12.2.3 Baseline for Italy 12.2.4 Baseline for Cyprus 12.2.5 Baseline for Malta 12.2.6 Baseline for Greece 12.3 Baselines for Central and Eastern Europe 12.3.1 Baseline for Poland 12.3.2 Baseline for Hungary 12.3.3 Baseline for Czech Republic 12.3.4 Baseline for Slovakia 12.3.5 Baseline for Slovenia 12.3.6 Baseline for Bulgaria 12.3.7 Baseline for Romania 12.3.8 Baseline for Austria 12.3.9 Baseline for Germany 12.4 Baselines for North-Western Europe 12.4.1 Baseline for Denmark 12.4.2 Baseline for the Netherlands 12.4.3 Baseline for France 12.4.4 Baseline for Belgium 12.4.5 Baseline for the UK 12.4.6 Baseline for Ireland 12.5 Baselines for Northern Europe 12.5.1 Baseline for Finland 12.5.2 Baseline for Sweden 12.5.3 Baseline for Lithuania 12.5.4 Baseline for Latvia 12.5.5 Baseline for Estonia13 Annex 6 Detailed explanation of five steps on Decision tree for prioritising adaptation options14 Annex 7 Overview of Selected Adaptation Options Assessed 14.1.1 Early warning systems 14.1.2 Cooling of hospitals using passive cooling systems 14.1.3 Storm retention reservoirs 14.1.4 Sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) 14.1.5 Awareness raising for companies regarding adaptation to climate change 14.1.6 Setting up Anti-hail nets 14.1.7 Buffer/vegetation strips 14.1.8 On farm harvesting and storage of rainwater 14.1.9 Enhance floodplain management 14.1.10 Plant winter cover 14.1.11 Improvement of animal rearing conditions under increasing temperature 14.1.12 Improved forest management: Forest Thinning Practices 14.2 Overview of Options with Qualitative Estimation of Costs and Benefits 14.2.1 Hydropower stations 14.2.2 Adaptation of tourism services and infrastructures15 Annex 8 Methodology Applied by the ClimateCost Project16 Annex 9 Summary Assessment of Instruments17 Annex 10 Overview of Commission proposals on the 2014-2020 EU Cohesion Policy18 Annex 11: Overview of potential barriers, success factors and enabling conditions19 Annex 12: Boxes with examples of climate proofing20 Annex 13 Overview of barriers to integrating climate adaptation within the CAP and solutions identified
标签	Report ; Adaptation ; Agriculture ; Climate
关键词	Mediterranean Spain Portugal Italy Cyprus Malta Greece Central and Eastern Europe Poland Hungary Czech Republic Slovakia Slovenia Bulgaria Romania Austria Germany North-Western Europe Denmark Netherlands France Belgium UK
URL	https://www.ecologic.eu/8665
来源智库	Ecologic Institute (Germany)
资源类型	智库出版物
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36471
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Jenny Tröltzsch,Dr. Ana Frelih-Larsen. Methodologies for Climate Proofing Investments and Measures under Cohesion and Regional Policy and the Common Agricultural Policy. 2012.