Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.2760/722208 (print), 10.2760/649695 (online) |
ISBN | 978-92-79-64993-6 (print), 978-92-79-64994-3 (pdf) |
ISSN | 1018-5593 (print), 1831-9424 (online) |
Common Understanding of Using Mitigation Measures for Reaching Good Ecological Potential for Heavily Modified Water Bodies | |
[unavailable] | |
发表日期 | 2016 |
出版者 | Publications Office of the European Union (Publications Office) |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Part 1: Impacted by water storageThe Water Directors of European countries agreed to set up a specific Ad-hoc Task Group (ATG) on best practice and guidance to deal with hydromorphology. One of the core activities of the Working Group (WG) ECOSTAT of the WFD CIS has been to compare the ecological quality expected by different countries for water bodies impacted by water storage. This report is based on information collected via a template on mitigation measures for water bodies impacted by water storage, which was completed by 23 countries. |
摘要 | class="field field-name-field-pub-title-additions field-type-text field-label-hidden"> Part 1: Impacted by water storage In the latest Work Programme 2016-2018 of the Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), the Water Directors of European countries agreed to set up a specific Ad-hoc Task Group (ATG) on best practice and guidance to deal with hydromorphology. In this context, one of the core activities of the Working Group (WG) ECOSTAT of the WFD CIS has been to compare the ecological quality expected by different countries for water bodies impacted by water storage. The process involved the use of a number of workshops and questionnaires to collect relevant information from European water managers. This report is based on information collected via a template on mitigation measures for water bodies impacted by water storage, which was completed by 23 countries and edited by Eleftheria Kampa (Ecologic Institute) and Sebastian Döbbelt-Grüne (Planungsbüro Koenzen). This report was written by the GEP water storage core group of the WG ECOSTAT. Hydromorphological alterations for water storage are among the most widespread pressures on water bodies in Europe. Because of the importance of the water uses relying on water storage, such as hydroelectricity generation and public water supply, many of the affected water bodies have been designated as heavily modified. However, in a substantial number of these water bodies, the effects of the alterations are expected to require some mitigation if good ecological potential (GEP) is to be achieved. The report is available for download. |
目录 | Table of Contents: Acknowledgements Abstract 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope of the report 1.2 Key principles – Heavily Modified Water Bodies and Ecological Potential 1.3 Intercalibration of ecological status and potential 1.4 Mandate and scope of the information exchange on GEP mitigation measures 1.5 Relevant water uses for HMWB designation 2 Water storage and impacts on water bodies 2.1 Key principles – hydropower and water storage 2.2 Large dams for water storage in Europe 2.3 HMWB designation due to hydropower 2.4 Key terms in this report 3 European questionnaires on Mitigation Measures for water bodies impacted by water storage 3.1 Overview of mitigation measure template 3.2 Specific questions in the mitigation measure template 3.3 Responding countries 4 Report structure & content 5 Key measures to mitigate impacts from water storage in Europe 5.1 Overview of key measure types 5.2 Mitigation of impacts in national lists of mitigation measures 6 Mitigation for interrupted continuity for fish 6.1 Description and applicability 6.1.1 Mitigation measure options or combinations needs 7 Mitigation for flow alteration 7.1 Description and applicability 7.1.1 Mitigation measure options or combinations needs 8 Mitigation for sediment alteration 8.1 Description and applicability 8.1.1 Mitigation measure options or combinations needs 9 Mitigation of ponded rivers (impoundments) 9.1 Description and applicability 9.1.1 Mitigation measure options or combinations needs 10 Mitigation of lake level alteration 10.1 Description and applicability 10.1.1 Mitigation measure options or combinations needs 11 Mitigation for physico-chemical alteration 11.1 Description and applicability 11.2 Mitigation measure options or combinations needs 12 Sustainable vs. non-sustainable mitigation solutions 13 Scale of impacts typically mitigated 14 Significant adverse effect on water use and wider environment 14.1 Significant adverse effect upon storage for hydropower 14.2 Significant adverse effect upon storage for uses other than hydropower 14.3 Significant adverse effects on wider environment 15 Reasons for “outruling” measures 16 Minimum requirements for GEP and objective setting 17 Key findings 17.1 Understanding the impacts on ecological condition 17.2 Minimum spatial scale of impacts requiring mitigation 17.3 How comprehensive are the mitigation measures libraries of the responding countries? 17.4 Assessing the degree of similarity between responding countries on impacts and mitigation measures 17.5 Assessing the degree of similarity on ecological and practical effectiveness of measures 17.6 Comparability of criteria to select/rule out mitigation measures 17.7 Assessing similarity on adverse effect on water use 17.8 Minimum ecological requirement for GEP 18 Conclusions and recommendations 18.1 GEP is possible to harmonise 18.2 Common terminology 18.3 Emerging good practice 18.4 Minimum requirements for GEP or use of exemptions in HMWB 18.5 Clarify criteria for determining significant adverse effects on water use 18.6 Spatial scale and relevance of impacts 18.7 Applying national methods to a common set of HMWBs References List of abbreviations and definitions List of figures List of tables |
标签 | Report ; Water |
关键词 | Water Framework Directive heavily modified water bodies good ecological potential hydropower |
URL | https://www.ecologic.eu/14545 |
来源智库 | Ecologic Institute (Germany) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36633 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | [unavailable]. Common Understanding of Using Mitigation Measures for Reaching Good Ecological Potential for Heavily Modified Water Bodies. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[[unavailable]]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。