Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
"Paris Compatible" Governance: long-term policy frameworks to drive transformational change | |
Matthias Duwe; Melissa Maxter; Linda Mederake; Robert Ostwald; Arne Riedel, LLM; Katharina Umpfenbach; Elizabeth Zelljadt; Doris Knoblauch; Ewa Iwaszuk; Mona Freundt | |
发表日期 | 2017 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | A comparative analysis of national & sub-national case studies13 case studies from different parts of the world are presented in this report as examples for policy-makers and stakeholders interested in developing long-term climate policy frameworks that are compatible with the Paris Agreement. |
摘要 | class="field field-name-field-pub-title-additions field-type-text field-label-hidden"> A comparative analysis of national & sub-national case studies Governments around the world have already adopted long-term climate frameworks, many in legal form. Many others are in the process of developing similar laws or strategies. These overarching long-term frameworks are critical to effectively implementing the Paris Agreement, as tools for managing the necessary transformation of all sectors of the economy. Such climate frameworks help set appropriate long-term targets, chart pathways towards them and identify the necessary policies. They can also help build political support, engage stakeholders and expert advice and create accountability. And they can facilitate raising ambition further — as foreseen under the new Paris system. The 13 case studies from different parts of the world all show unique features, which this report presents as examples for policy-makers and stakeholders interested in developing similar frameworks, that are compatible with the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement is a landmark agreement in many respects. It signals the global consensus to take urgent action on climate change but also establishes the long-term objectives that need to be reached. The Agreement also introduces a new governance framework, that consists of nationally determined contributions, five-year review cycles to increase ambition over time, and long-term strategies. Governments at different levels realise that effectively implementing Paris requires new long-term governance frameworks to be adopted in their contexts. Climate governance is a new field of study and needs urgent attention for this Paris implementation phase. This report hopes to contribute to the growing evidence base on effective long-term governance systems and to support those policy-makers interested in developing such frameworks. Mindful of the different circumstances and respective design choices, the analysis of 13 case studies (six nation states, two sub-national states and five cities) provides for a set of conclusion, which could inform the development of similar long-term climate laws and strategies around the world: Overarching lessons
Design features
Sub-national experience
This analysis is part of a larger ongoing research effort which aims to enhance our understanding of the development and effective implementation of long-term climate governance that can be compatible with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. Several of the issues touched upon in this paper will be explored in deeper and more detailed analyses of the cases of the UK climate act and the French energy transition law, which is being carried out by the Grantham Institute and IDDRI, respectively. Given the relative novelty of long-term climate governance, the present assessment is based largely on potential and not yet on measurable performance. That said, the experiences gained from more mature models provide a basis for predicting the potential impact of newer regimes. |
目录 | Table of Contents: 1 Introduction and background 2 Methodology: what makes for effective long-term climate governance frameworks? 2.1 Scope and research questions 2.2 Specific methodology 3 Case study results – comparative discussion across key design elements 4 Material data base – the case studies 4.1 Country: France 4.2 Country: Germany 4.3 Country: Ireland 4.4 Country: Mexico 4.5 Country: Sweden 4.6 Country: United Kingdom 4.7 Sub-national government: California 4.8 Sub-national government: Scotland 4.9 Sub-national government / city: Berlin, Germany 4.10 City: Bogotá, Colombia 4.11 City: Denver, USA 4.12 City: Kempten, Germany 4.13 City: Sydney, Australia 5 References |
标签 | Report ; Climate ; Governance |
关键词 | long-term climate frameworks France Germany Ireland Mexico Sweden United Kingdom California Scotland Berlin Bogotá Colombia Denver USA Kempten Sydney Australia case study |
URL | https://www.ecologic.eu/15218 |
来源智库 | Ecologic Institute (Germany) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36671 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Matthias Duwe,Melissa Maxter,Linda Mederake,et al. "Paris Compatible" Governance: long-term policy frameworks to drive transformational change. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。