Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.2760/875939 (online) |
ISBN | 978-92-79-80289-8 (print), 978-92-79-80290-4 (pdf) |
ISSN | 1018-5593 (print), 1831-9424 (online) |
WG ECOSTAT Report on Common Understanding of Using Mitigation Measures for Reaching Good Ecological Potential for HMWBs (Part 2) | |
Dr. Eleftheria Kampa | |
发表日期 | 2018 |
出版者 | European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)Publications Office of the European Union (Publications Office) |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Impacted by flood protection structuresOne of the core activities for the Common Implementation Strategy Working Group ECOSTAT between 2013 and 2017 has been to try to compare the ecological quality expected by different countries for water bodies impacted by flood protection. The process involved the use of a number of workshops and questionnaires to collect relevant information from European water managers. This report, edited by Dr. Eleftheria Kampa (Ecologic Institute) and Martina Bussettini, is based on information collected via a template on mitigation measures for water bodies impacted by flood defence structures, which was completed by 18 countries. The report is available for download. |
摘要 | class="field field-name-field-pub-title-additions field-type-text field-label-hidden"> Impacted by flood protection structures One of the core activities for the Common Implementation Strategy Working Group ECOSTAT between 2013 and 2017 has been to try to compare the ecological quality expected by different countries for water bodies impacted by flood protection. The process involved the use of a number of workshops and questionnaires to collect relevant information from European water managers. This report, edited by Dr. Eleftheria Kampa (Ecologic Institute) and M. Bussettini, is based on information collected via a template on mitigation measures for water bodies impacted by flood defence structures, which was completed by 18 countries. The report is available for download. Hydromorphological alterations due to floods are among the most widespread pressures on water bodies in Europe. Along with storms, floods are the most relevant natural disaster in Europe, in terms of economic costs due to direct damage to infrastructure, property and agricultural land, and indirect losses. As such, flood protection structures and actions are among the main causes for hydromorphological alteration and ecological impairment. Moreover, mitigation measures options, in the case of heavily modified water bodies (HMWB) for flood protection, are very limited. Any action for mitigation could in fact result into a weakening of flood protection, increasing risk for population and assets. However, in a substantial number of these water bodies, the effects of the alterations are expected to require some mitigation if good ecological potential (GEP) is to be achieved. |
目录 | Table of Contents: Acknowledgements Abstract 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope of the report 1.2 Key principles - Heavily Modified Water Bodies and Ecological Potential 1.3 Intercalibration of ecological status and potential 1.4 Mandate and scope of the information exchange on GEP mitigation measures 1.5 Report structure and content 2 Flood defences and impacts on water bodies 2.1 What is a "flood"? 2.2 Flooding in Europe 2.3 What are flood defences? 2.4 Relationship to Floods Directive 2.5 HMWB designation due to flood protection 3 European questionnaires on Floods and GEP 3.1 Structure of the questionnaire on Floods & GEP 3.2 General questions on HMWB designation 3.3 Specific questions on impact detection and mitigation measures 4 Outcomes from the European questionnaire on Floods & GEP 4.1 Responding countries 4.2 Impact detection 4.2.1 Ability of MS methodologies for hydromorphological assessment to detect hydromorphological alteration 4.2.2 Spatial extent of hydromorphological impacts 4.2.3 Relevance of the alteration for the achievement of legitimate use and effect on the ecological status 4.3 Mitigation measures 4.3.1 Types of mitigation measures 4.3.2 WFD pressures and mitigation measures related to flood protection 4.4 Management and maintenance 4.4.1 Mitigation measures related to flood protection: presence in MS national libraries and/or consideration of impacts from flood defence 4.4.2 MS assumed effectiveness of mitigation measures to improve hydromorphology and biological quality vs. effect of measures on use 4.5 Reasons for ruling out mitigation measures to classify a HMWB as GEP 5 Conclusions and recommendations for flood protection References List of abbreviations and definitions List of figures List of tables Annexes Annex 1 - Relevant EC documents and sources Annex 2 - UK Specific Mitigation Measures Annex 3 – More detailed flood protection measures in Germany |
标签 | Report ; Water |
URL | https://www.ecologic.eu/15862 |
来源智库 | Ecologic Institute (Germany) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36716 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dr. Eleftheria Kampa. WG ECOSTAT Report on Common Understanding of Using Mitigation Measures for Reaching Good Ecological Potential for HMWBs (Part 2). 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Dr. Eleftheria Kampa]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Dr. Eleftheria Kampa]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Dr. Eleftheria Kampa]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。