Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.2760/444293 (online) |
ISBN | 978-92-79-80306-2 (print), 978-92-79-80305-5 (pdf) |
ISSN | 1018-5593 (print), 1831-9424 (online) |
WG ECOSTAT Report on Common Understanding of Using Mitigation Measures for Reaching Good Ecological Potential for HMWBs (Part 3) | |
Dr. Josselin Rouillard; Dr. Eleftheria Kampa | |
发表日期 | 2018 |
出版者 | European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)Publications Office of the European Union (Publications Office) |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Impacted by drainage schemesHydromorphological alterations for drainage are widespread pressures on water bodies in Europe. Because of the importance of the water uses relying on drainage schemes, such as agriculture and urban areas, not all necessary restoration measures can be taken without significant adverse effect on the water use. Therefore many of the affected water bodies have been designated as heavily modified (HMWB). Still, in a substantial number of these water bodies, some mitigation measures should be taken to reach Good Ecological Potential (GEP). The report, edited by Ecologic Institute's Dr. Eleftheria Kampa and Dr. Josselin Rouillard, is available for download. |
摘要 | class="field field-name-field-pub-title-additions field-type-text field-label-hidden"> Impacted by drainage schemes Hydromorphological alterations for drainage are widespread pressures on water bodies in Europe. Because of the importance of the water uses relying on drainage schemes, such as agriculture and urban areas, not all necessary restoration measures can be taken without significant adverse effect on the water use. Therefore many of the affected water bodies have been designated as heavily modified (HMWB). Still, in a substantial number of these water bodies, some mitigation measures should be taken to reach Good Ecological Potential (GEP). The report, edited by Ecologic Institute's Dr. Eleftheria Kampa and Dr. Josselin Rouillard, is available for download. This report presents responses of European countries on a detailed questionnaire distributed in 2015 on the impacts of land drainage on the water environment and the measures that can mitigate those impacts. A key objective of the questionnaire was to compare the understanding of impacts caused by drainage to continuity, hydrological regime, morphological alterations and aquatic biology. Information was requested on
A list of mitigation measures and their definition is presented. In total, 20 countries responded to the questions on land drainage. |
目录 | Table of Contents: Acknowledgements Abstract 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope of the report 1.2 Key principles – Heavily Modified Water Bodies and Ecological Potential 1.3 Intercalibration of ecological status and potential 1.4 Mandate and scope of the information exchange on GEP mitigation measures 1.5 Report structure and content 2 Drainage and impacts on water bodies 2.1 What is "drainage"? 2.2 What are drainage schemes? 2.3 Key terms used in this report 2.4 HMWB designation due to drainage 3 European questionnaire on drainage and GEP 3.1 Structure of the questionnaire 3.2 Issues covered through the questionnaire 3.3 Scope of the report and results presented 4 Drivers and pressures of land drainage 4.1 Definition of drainage 4.2 Sectors and operators leading to land drainage 4.3 Pressures from drainage 4.4 Legal requirements on drainage operation and maintenance 5 Hydromorphological alterations from land drainage 6 Ability of methods to detect hydromorphological alterations 7 Relevance of drainage alterations for reaching good ecological status 8 Value of drainage alterations to the water use 9 Maintenance operation 9.1 Typical maintenance operation 9.2 Impact on ecological status due to maintenance operation 10 Designation of heavily modified water bodies due to drainage 10.1 Water category 10.2 Significant adverse effect on water use 11 Key measures to mitigate impacts from land drainage 11.1 Overview of mitigation measures 11.2 Description of key mitigation measures 11.3 Mitigation measures related to drainage: presence in national libraries 11.4 Ecological effectiveness of mitigation measures 11.5 Effects of mitigation measures on land drainage 11.6 Reasons for ruling out measures 12 Conclusions and recommendations 12.1 Harmonized understanding of GEP 12.2 Common terminology 12.3 Harmonized hydromorphological classification methods 12.4 Minimum requirements for GEP 12.5 Clarify criteria for determining significant adverse effects on water use 12.6 Reason for ruling out measures 12.7 Applying national methods to a common set of HMWBs 13 References 14 Annexes 14.1 Example 1: Groote Molenbeek, The Netherlands 14.2 Example 2: Wagenfelder Aue, Germany (Lower Saxony) List of abbreviations List of figures List of tables |
标签 | Report ; Water |
URL | https://www.ecologic.eu/15863 |
来源智库 | Ecologic Institute (Germany) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36717 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dr. Josselin Rouillard,Dr. Eleftheria Kampa. WG ECOSTAT Report on Common Understanding of Using Mitigation Measures for Reaching Good Ecological Potential for HMWBs (Part 3). 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。