Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 论文 |
DOI | 10.1007/s10784-004-3095-6 |
ISSN | 1567-9764, 1573-1553 |
Reforming International Environmental Governance. | |
Prof. Sebastian Oberth?r | |
发表日期 | 2004 |
出版者 | Kluwer Academic Publishers (Kluwer Academic Publishers), Netherlands |
出版年 | 2004 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | An Institutionalist Critique of the Proposal for a World Environment OrganisationIn this article Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring argue that a World Environment Organisation (WEO) does not promise to enhance international environmental governance. The authors claim that the establishment of an international organisation alone in a policy field currently populated by regimes cannot be expected to significantly improve environmental governance because there is no qualitative difference between these two forms of governance institutions. This article does not address in detail or extend upon recent proposals for giving more importance to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) or for upgrading it to a special UN organisation. |
摘要 | class="field field-name-field-pub-title-additions field-type-text field-label-hidden"> An Institutionalist Critique of the Proposal for a World Environment Organisation In this article Sebastian Oberth?r and Thomas Gehring argue that a World Environment Organisation (WEO) does not promise to enhance international environmental governance. The authors claim that the establishment of an international organisation alone in a policy field currently populated by regimes cannot be expected to significantly improve environmental governance because there is no qualitative difference between these two forms of governance institutions. This article?does not address in detail or extend upon recent proposals for giving more importance to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) or for upgrading it to a special UN organisation. Furthermore, they submit that significant improvement of international environmental governance through institutional re-arrangement must rely on a modification of decision-making procedures and/or a change of institutional boundaries. The authors develop three principal models of a possible WEO:?
In conclusion, a WEO cannot be at the same time realistic, significant and beneficial for international environmental governance. Available political resources should be invested in advancing existing and emerging sectoral environmental regimes rather than in establishing a WEO. The article is available for download at Springer at the price of 34.95?? |
目录 | Table of Contents: 1. Introduction2. The Distinction between Regimes and Organisations - Fiction rather than Reality3. The Decision-Making Capacity of International Institutions 3.1 The Design of Decision-Making Processes 3.2? The Delimitation of Problem Areas4. Options for a World Environment Organisation: Three Models 4.1 UN Model: An Umbrella Organsation 4.2 WTO Model: Creating Comprehensive World Environment Rounds 4.3 EU Model: Delegating Extensive Competencies to a WEO5. Conclusion |
标签 | Article ; Global Environment ; Governance |
关键词 | co-operation theory global international environmental governance multilateral agreements regime WEO UNEO World Environment Organisation |
URL | https://www.ecologic.eu/1343 |
来源智库 | Ecologic Institute (Germany) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36848 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Prof. Sebastian Oberth?r. Reforming International Environmental Governance.. 2004. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Prof. Sebastian Oberth?r]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Prof. Sebastian Oberth?r]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Prof. Sebastian Oberth?r]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。