G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型论文
ISSN1125-1255
The German Experience with Full Cost Recovery in the Water Sector
Dominic Marcellino; Max Grünig
发表日期2011
出版者Associazione Idrotecnica Italiana , Italy
出版年2011
语种英语
概述Practice and ProblemsDominic Marcellino, Fellow Ecologic Institute Washington, and Max Grünig, Fellow Ecologic Institute Berlin, published an article on cost recovery in line with the EU Water Framework Directive and related experiences in Germany. The text appeared in the March/April special edition of L’Acqua, an Italian journal for water issues. The paper builds off previous work done for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
摘要class="field field-name-field-pub-title-additions field-type-text field-label-hidden">
Practice and Problems

Dominic Marcellino, Fellow Ecologic Institute Washington, and Max Grünig, Fellow Ecologic Institute Berlin, published an article on cost recovery in line with the EU Water Framework Directive and related experiences in Germany. The text appeared in the March/April special edition of L’Acqua, an Italian journal for water issues. The paper builds off previous work done for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) was enacted in 2000 to address issues of water quality and water quantity in the European Union. It aims to improve the ecological status of aquatic environment by 2015 through a number of sustainable management practices. An essential aspect is the WFD’s polluter-pays-principle, which not only incorporates financial costs, but also environmental and resource costs into the price of water. By 2010, the more accurate price of water is supposed to be an incentive for consumers to use the resource more efficiently.

The water service systems of two German cities give examples of two different utilities. Berlin’s water servicing company (Berliner Wasserbetriebe – BWB) is a large, public-private company. The city of Leipzig is served by a smaller, municipal utility (Kommunale Wasserwerke Leipzig – KWL). The applied method developed by Antonio Massarutto from the University of Udine allowed for an assessment of the cost effectiveness of the two different systems. Only the BWB’s tariffs and fees showed themselves to sustainably cover the full recovery cost and would therefore meet the requirements of the WFD.

Germany is in need of improved water legislation as it is facing a number of challenges in the field. Changing demographics put new demands on water infrastructure as will the predicted results of climate change. Addressing these issues will be costly, which makes the determination of effective cost recovery mechanisms, such as a split tariff structure, even more important. Germany’s laws and regulations should be adjusted to support the respective methodology.

目录Table of Contents: IntroductionWater Services Organization in GermanyAssessing Full-Cost Recovery – the Massarutto MethodologyCase Studies of the German Water Services System – Berlin and LeipzigBerlin – the BWBLeipzig – the KWLApplying the Methodology – ResultsConclusion – Issues and Limitations in the German Water Services System
标签Article ; EU Environment ; Sustainability ; Water
关键词water full cost recovery Germany
URLhttps://www.ecologic.eu/4132
来源智库Ecologic Institute (Germany)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/36909
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dominic Marcellino,Max Grünig. The German Experience with Full Cost Recovery in the Water Sector. 2011.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dominic Marcellino]的文章
[Max Grünig]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dominic Marcellino]的文章
[Max Grünig]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dominic Marcellino]的文章
[Max Grünig]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。