Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Case Study |
规范类型 | 其他 |
Case Study Report - Sustainable Consumption and Production Niches | |
Katharina Umpfenbach; Haran Bar-On | |
发表日期 | 2012 |
出版年 | 2012 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This empirical report presents the four case studies of the InContext project:. GELA - GEmeinsam LAndwirtschaften, a community-supported agriculture project and Thursday Veggie Day, an initiative to reduce meat consumption, and- Municipal Energy Transition Process and Emission-Zero cooperative, two projects for citizen-led investments in renewable energies. The study is available for download. |
摘要 | class="field field-name-field-master-image field-type-image field-label-hidden"> This empirical report presents the four case studies of the InContext project:. GELA - GEmeinsam LAndwirtschaften, a community-supported agriculture project and Thursday Veggie Day, an initiative to reduce meat consumption, and - Municipal Energy Transition Process and Emission-Zero cooperative, two projects for citizen-led investments in renewable energies. The general purpose is to provide a better understanding of how niches of alternative and more sustainable consumption and production practices are created, and how they can later be diffused or mainstreamed. The case study [pdf, 2.9 MB, English] report is available for download. |
目录 | Table of Contents: A. Executive summary B. Introduction C. Methodology Document analysis (see also D3.1) Participative Network Analysis - PNA Semi-structured Interviews and observations Overview of the case specific methodological aspects Gela 23 Wolfhagen 100% RES Thursday Veggie Day (TVD) from Ghent to Brussels Emissions-Zero cooperative D. Case Studies 1 GELA - GEmeinsam LAndwirtschaften 1.1 Overview of the Case Study (fact sheet) 1.2 Overall aim: characteristics and purposes sought by the niche creation 1.2.1 Alternative practices 1.2.2 Niche characteristics 1.3 Emergence of a ‘configuration that works’ 1.3.1 Grounds of the process: Gela’s collective contexts 1.3.2 The concretisation of the niche: Individual inner and outer contexts 1.3.3 Intermediate summary 1.4 On-going process: perpetuation, governance and institutionalisation of the niche 1.4.1 Evolution and transformation of the niche 1.4.2 Internal governance of the niche 1.4.3 ‘External’ governance of the niche 1.4.4 Intermediate conclusion: Drivers and barriers towards niche creation, perpetuation and institutionalisation 1.5 Patterns of diffusion 1.5.1 Configurational specificity and replicability 1.5.2 Enlargement 1.5.3 Insights on the diffusion of the niches: drivers and barriers 1.6 Conclusion References Annex A: Methodological specifications - Gela Annex A.1: Document Analysis Annex A.2: Participative Network Analysis Annex A.3: Interviews 2 Wolfhagen: Municipal Energy Transition Process 2.1 Overview of the case study in Wolfhagen 2.2 Overall aim: characteristics and purposes sought by the niche creation in Wolfhagen 2.2.1 Wolfhagen’s energy transition process: an alternative practice? 2.2.2 Wolfhagen’s niche characteristics 2.3 Emergence of a ‘configuration that works’ in Wolfhagen InContext – Deliverable 3.2: Case study report: empirical report iii 2.3.1 Grounds of the energy transition process 2.3.2 Main aspects of the energy transition process 2.4 Ongoing process 2.4.1 Evolutions and transformations in the case of Wolfhagen 2.4.2 Governance of Wolfhagen’s energy transition process 2.4.3 Intermediate conclusion 2.4.4 Wolfhagen’s energy transition process: pioneering, repeatable or unique? 2.5 Conclusion References 3 Thursday Veggie Day 3.1 General picture of the case study 3.2 Overall aim: characteristics and purposes sought by the niche creation 3.2.1 Alternative practices 3.2.2 Niche characteristics 3.3 Emergence of a ‘configuration that works’ 3.3.1 Grounds of the process 3.3.2 The concretisation of the niche / Enactment of alternative collective practices 3.4 Ongoing process: perpetuation, governance and institutionalisation of the niche 3.4.1 Evolutions and transformations of the niche 3.4.2 Internal governance of the niche 3.4.3 ‘External’ governance of the niche 3.4.4 Intermediate conclusion: Drivers and barriers towards niche creation, perpetuation and institutionalisation 3.5 Patterns of diffusion 3.5.1 Configurational specificity and replicability 3.5.2 Current diffusion processes and strategies 3.5.3 Insights on the diffusion of the niches 3.6 Conclusion Annexes Annex A: EVA’s Stakeholders (detailed version) Annex B: EVA's internal organogram from the Policy Programme 2011-2015 Annex C: The 5 Strategic Objectives (SO) – EVA Policy Programme 2011-2015 4 Emission-Zero cooperative 4.1 General picture of the case study 4.2 Overall aim: characteristics and purposes sought by the niche creation 4.2.1 Alternative practices 4.2.2 Niche characteristics 4.3 Emergence of a ‘configuration that works’ 4.3.1 Grounds of the process 4.3.2 The concretisation of the niche / Enactment of alternative collective practices 4.4 Ongoing process: perpetuation, governance and institutionalisation of the niche 4.4.1 Evolutions and transformations of the niche 4.4.2 Internal governance of the niche 4.4.3 ‘External’ governance of the niche1 Intermediate conclusion: Drivers and barriers towards niche creation, endurance) and institutionalisation InContext – Deliverable 3.2: Case study report: empirical report 4.5 Patterns of diffusion 4.5.1 Configurational specificity and replicability 4.5.2 Current diffusion processes and strategies 4.5.3 Insights on the diffusion of the niches 4.6 Conclusion References Annex A: Insight into a cooperative wind turbine’s financial plan Annex B: REScoop’s Shared Energy Charter 5 General conclusion References |
标签 | Case Study ; Consumer Policy ; Sustainability |
关键词 | consumption production |
URL | https://www.ecologic.eu/8687 |
来源智库 | Ecologic Institute (Germany) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/37372 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Katharina Umpfenbach,Haran Bar-On. Case Study Report - Sustainable Consumption and Production Niches. 2012. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。