Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Project |
规范类型 | 研究项目 |
项目编号 | 1750-19 |
Environmentally-Harmful Subsidies | |
Aaron Best; Daniel Blobel; Dr. Ingo Bräuer; Barry Fischer | |
开始日期 | 2006-09 |
结束日期 | 2007-03 |
资助机构 | European Commission, Directorate-General Environment (DG Environment) |
概述 | Long lived environmentally-harmful subsidies are numerous in Europe – coal is an oft-stated example, as are some aspects of the common agricultural policy (CAP) and common fisheries policy (CFP). Ecologic Institute is one of three institutions funded by the European Commission and DG Environment that will provide an ad-hoc group of the European Council with an overview of all environmentally-harmful subsidies, in addition to an investigation of specific cases studies on attempts to remove subsidies in Member States.Reforming environmentally-harmful subsidiesRead more |
摘要 | Long lived environmentally-harmful subsidies are numerous in Europe – coal is an oft-stated example, as are some aspects of the common agricultural policy (CAP) and common fisheries policy (CFP). Ecologic Institute is one of three institutions funded by the European Commission and DG Environment that will provide an ad-hoc group of the European Council with an overview of all environmentally-harmful subsidies, in addition to an investigation of specific cases studies on attempts to remove subsidies in Member States. Reforming environmentally-harmful subsidies (EHS) is an important area of work in the context of environmental fiscal reform. At the EU level, the commitment to reduce EHS has been reaffirmed several times. The latest high-level statement in this context was given by the Spring European Council of 2006, which endorsed the “further exploration of ... a reform of subsidies that have considerable negative effects on the environment and are incompatible with sustainable development, with a view to gradually eliminating them.“ Subsequently, the Commission established a High Level Group on Competitiveness, Energy and the Environment in February 2006. The aim of this project is to provide information and ideas to this ad-hoc group. The objective of this report has been to investigate:
It does this by reviewing the current literature, developing a long list of case studies based on specific criteria, and selecting a subset of case studies to conduct in-depth analysis to identify lessons learnt. The case studies examine the original rationale behind the subsidy, the process leading up to the reform, the role of stakeholders in the process, the scale and duration of the subsidy, the negative impacts on the environment, and their potential implication for Community State Aid rules. Most case studies relate to energy and transport sectors, but there are also some examples from the water sector. |
标签 | EU Environment |
关键词 | Subsides Harmful subsidy Community State Aid policy EHS energy transport water Europe |
URL | https://www.ecologic.eu/3631 |
来源智库 | Ecologic Institute (Germany) |
资源类型 | 智库项目 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/38879 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Aaron Best,Daniel Blobel,Dr. Ingo Bräuer,et al. Environmentally-Harmful Subsidies. 2006. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。