| 来源类型 | DIIS Policy Brief |
| 规范类型 | 简报 |
| Immediate versus sustainable poverty reduction? | |
| Lindsay Whitfield | |
| 发表日期 | 2012 |
| 出版年 | 2012 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | To help smallholders out of poverty, an integrated industry-wide approach is necessary. Focusing on smallholders alone will not do the job. However, the dominant poverty reduction approach of many official aid agencies focuses on livelihoods, marginal income increases and food security. When operating in productive sectors, donors mainly want to support production by small-scale farmers or informal sector producers. But many of these initiatives are not sustainable, because they fail to see small-scale producers as embedded within an industry and forget to ask what economic transformation is necessary to make that industry grow as a whole and to integrate the small-scale farmers or informal sector producers. |
| 主题 | Food and agriculture ; Inequality and poverty |
| URL | https://www.diis.dk/en/research/immediate-versus-sustainable-poverty-reduction |
| 来源智库 | Danish Institute for International Studies (Denmark) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/391697 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lindsay Whitfield. Immediate versus sustainable poverty reduction?. 2012. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| PB_Immediate_versus_（273KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Lindsay Whitfield]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Lindsay Whitfield]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Lindsay Whitfield]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
