| 来源类型 | Journal article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2013.856300 |
| Going non-nuclear in the nuclear alliance | |
| Cindy Vestergaard | |
| 发表日期 | 2014-01-31 |
| 出处 | European Security, 23:1 |
| 出版年 | 2014 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Danish nuclear policy is at a crossroads. Looking back, Denmark’s relationship to nuclear technology has been a difficult balancing act for successive governments, trying to soothe an anti-nuclear domestic sentiment on one side and the membership of a nuclear military alliance on the other. This history produced an enduring double approach to nuclear policy by Copenhagen throughout the cold war. Looking ahead, this history is of particular relevance as Denmark and Greenland are considering lifting their twenty-five-year ban on mining radioactive elements and allowing the production of Greenland’s uranium. With Greenland’s large reserves potentially catapulting this otherwise non-nuclear and non-mining kingdom into one of the world’s top suppliers of uranium, the policy debate has to include a look back at Denmark’s relationship to nuclear technology, for both peaceful and military purposes Read the full article by Cindy Vestergaard here |
| 主题 | Oil, gas and minerals ; Security technologies ; Non-proliferation and disarmament |
| URL | https://www.diis.dk/en/research/going-non-nuclear-in-the-nuclear-alliance |
| 来源智库 | Danish Institute for International Studies (Denmark) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/392086 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Cindy Vestergaard. Going non-nuclear in the nuclear alliance. 2014. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Cindy Vestergaard]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Cindy Vestergaard]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Cindy Vestergaard]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
