G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
The 2016 Blowout Preventer Systems and Well Control Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?
Alan J. Krupnick; Isabel Echarte
发表日期2018-05-03
出版年2018
页码24 pp.
语种英语
概述

As part of a series examining US oil and gas sector regulations, this report analyzes the cost and benefits of repealing or modifying a safety rule for offshore drilling activity under several scenarios.

结论
  • Keeping the rule would result in net benefits over the next 10 years that are $65 million larger than what was estimated in the original cost-benefit analysis by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE).
  • Because of a deregulatory provision in the rule, benefits to industry alone outweigh the costs by over $500 million. Repealing the entire rule would therefore harm industry.
  • BSEE admitted that it underestimated the benefits from reducing oil spills, which could make it easy for the agency to argue that repealing regulatory provisions results in minimal forgone benefits.
  • Calculating a defensible external benefits estimate may not even be possible without more research into how much the rule or its individual requirements reduce oil spill risk.
  • 主题Energy and Electricity
    子主题Benefit-Cost Analysis ; Natural Gas ; Oil ; Shale Gas
    URLhttp://www.rff.org/research/publications/2016-blowout-preventer-systems-and-well-control-rule-should-it-stay-or-should
    来源智库Resources for the Future (United States)
    资源类型智库出版物
    条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/39504
    推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714
    Alan J. Krupnick,Isabel Echarte. The 2016 Blowout Preventer Systems and Well Control Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?. 2018.
    条目包含的文件
    条目无相关文件。
    个性服务
    推荐该条目
    保存到收藏夹
    导出为Endnote文件
    谷歌学术
    谷歌学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Isabel Echarte]的文章
    百度学术
    百度学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Isabel Echarte]的文章
    必应学术
    必应学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Isabel Echarte]的文章
    相关权益政策
    暂无数据
    收藏/分享

    除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。