G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
EPA’s 2016 Methane Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?
Alan J. Krupnick; Justine Huetteman; Arthur G. Fraas
发表日期2018-05-30
出版年2018
页码27 pp.
语种英语
概述

As part of a series examining US oil and gas sector regulations, this report analyzes the cost and benefits of repealing or modifying an EPA rule to regulate methane emissions under several scenarios.

结论
  • We estimate net costs to society of repealing the rule would be $27 million to $152 million using a global social cost of methane.
  • Using the domestic social cost of methane, net benefits to society of repealing the rule are estimated at $285 million to $457 million.
  • We find that certain modifications to EPA’s methane rule, such as excluding certain types of wells and adjusting leak surveying frequency, increase net benefits of the rule but decrease overall emissions reductions.
  • 主题Energy and Electricity
    子主题Benefit-Cost Analysis ; Natural Gas ; Oil ; Shale Gas
    URLhttp://www.rff.org/research/publications/epa-s-2016-methane-rule-should-it-stay-or-should-it-go
    来源智库Resources for the Future (United States)
    资源类型智库出版物
    条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/39506
    推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714
    Alan J. Krupnick,Justine Huetteman,Arthur G. Fraas. EPA’s 2016 Methane Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?. 2018.
    条目包含的文件
    条目无相关文件。
    个性服务
    推荐该条目
    保存到收藏夹
    导出为Endnote文件
    谷歌学术
    谷歌学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Justine Huetteman]的文章
    [Arthur G. Fraas]的文章
    百度学术
    百度学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Justine Huetteman]的文章
    [Arthur G. Fraas]的文章
    必应学术
    必应学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Justine Huetteman]的文章
    [Arthur G. Fraas]的文章
    相关权益政策
    暂无数据
    收藏/分享

    除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。