Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
EPA’s 2016 Methane Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go? | |
Alan J. Krupnick; Justine Huetteman; Arthur G. Fraas | |
发表日期 | 2018-05-30 |
出版年 | 2018 |
页码 | 27 pp. |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | As part of a series examining US oil and gas sector regulations, this report analyzes the cost and benefits of repealing or modifying an EPA rule to regulate methane emissions under several scenarios. |
结论 | |
主题 | Energy and Electricity |
子主题 | Benefit-Cost Analysis ; Natural Gas ; Oil ; Shale Gas |
URL | http://www.rff.org/research/publications/epa-s-2016-methane-rule-should-it-stay-or-should-it-go |
来源智库 | Resources for the Future (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/39506 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Alan J. Krupnick,Justine Huetteman,Arthur G. Fraas. EPA’s 2016 Methane Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。